Started By
Message

ESPN on AUBURN' OL play illegal? wtf -giving green light to refs to screw AU ?
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:43 pm
I have not seen this before but sure it has been discussed. In case you did not see they were debating if Auburn's PAP should be ruled illegal? The other guy said change the rules then if its hard to defend.
Are they setting up the refs for flags on Auburn?
Did Saban bitch? like with hunh?
What is the core of this I only caught the end?
Are they setting up the refs for flags on Auburn?
Did Saban bitch? like with hunh?
What is the core of this I only caught the end?
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:45 pm to Neuromancer
Anyone have a link to the video?
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:45 pm to Neuromancer
check the pollack thread below
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:45 pm to Neuromancer
Set up for the year long SEC dominance is over starting January 8 2014
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:46 pm to saturday
quote:
Pap?
Play action pass?
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:47 pm to Neuromancer
It's illegal already. Just need call the rules.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:50 pm to Schwaaz
call me ignorant or whatever but what the frick are you babbling on about? I'm not even sure what play you are referring to as illegal that we ran.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:50 pm to danfraz
sorry - play action pass. The one idiot on ESPN show argued fiercely that Auburns OL Run block was illegal and not fair for D because they are taught to read run or pass??
The other guys were like well its a play action pass. But they were making it an issue. As if it was an unfair advantage over Fla St.
I was thinking I have heard nothing of this?? Illegal man down field I guess? I never heard them state what the gripe was. BUt considering this was the bowl selection show - it was clear to me they were giving the wink to refs for something.
Anyone got any idea.
The other guys were like well its a play action pass. But they were making it an issue. As if it was an unfair advantage over Fla St.
I was thinking I have heard nothing of this?? Illegal man down field I guess? I never heard them state what the gripe was. BUt considering this was the bowl selection show - it was clear to me they were giving the wink to refs for something.
Anyone got any idea.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:51 pm to Schwaaz
The melt you and antibarner have been having since the IB has been really magical.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:51 pm to Neuromancer
ESPN is upset that their man Meyer is not in the championship game.


Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:55 pm to DMagic
Im looking for a discussion with people that know the rule they are discussing and what the issue is. Its not me. I want Auburn to win big time.
Sets precedent for the 4 team.
Is some Bama Saban crying HUNO shite? If this complaint on prime time ESPN Bowl selection came from Saban I would be surprised or not I don't know. But never heard of this issue ever before now in 40 years of watching ball.
Kids stay out of this thread.
Sets precedent for the 4 team.
Is some Bama Saban crying HUNO shite? If this complaint on prime time ESPN Bowl selection came from Saban I would be surprised or not I don't know. But never heard of this issue ever before now in 40 years of watching ball.
Kids stay out of this thread.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:00 pm to Neuromancer
I wasn't talking to you but your OP doesn't make any sense like 99% of your posts so that's why I didn't respond to you originally.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:02 pm to DMagic
When that flag comes out in the BCSCG I will damn sure let you all know it.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:03 pm to antibarner
quote:
When that flag comes out in the BCSCG I will damn sure let you all know it.
We very infrequently run that triple option PAP package. Even then, we typically do it when it is planned so I bet our coaches fix that problem.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:04 pm to antibarner
DMagic - that is why you shouldn't be in these conversations. You don't get it.
Football people get it.
NIght.
Football people get it.
NIght.
Popular
Back to top
