Started By
Message

So where does A&M and Mizzou rank in SEC now. Top 6? Talking going forward.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:23 pm
Save the history. A&M and Mizzou were not in the SEC. So starting last year and projecting lets say 10 years.
Who is YOUR top 6 for next ten years?
Basically like a pre season top 25 but for YOUR guess at top 6 in SEC.
I will say:
1. LSU
2. Bama
3. A&M
4. Ga.
5. Fla.
6. S.C./Mizzou
Who is YOUR top 6 for next ten years?
Basically like a pre season top 25 but for YOUR guess at top 6 in SEC.
I will say:
1. LSU
2. Bama
3. A&M
4. Ga.
5. Fla.
6. S.C./Mizzou
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:24 pm to Neuromancer
1. Bama
2. LSU
3. Georgia
4. Florida
5. Auburn
6. A&M
2. LSU
3. Georgia
4. Florida
5. Auburn
6. A&M
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:25 pm to jbond
A&M because of the talent in Texas. If Texas hires a better coach it could become a bit more difficult though
No idea with Mizzou, but I don't see them prolonging a level above any ofthe top 6 for long.
No idea with Mizzou, but I don't see them prolonging a level above any ofthe top 6 for long.
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:29 pm to Neuromancer
LSU is inferior to Texas A&M in almost every way. Your list should readjust accordingly.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:30 pm to Neuromancer
1, South Carolina
2-6, doesn't really matter.
2-6, doesn't really matter.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:31 pm to Neuromancer
quote:
1. LSU
2. Bama
And I didn't even notice this......
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:33 pm to CockInYourEar
I am not sure what to think with Mizzou. But they are in the East.
I must say your Auburn has me re thinking. Auburn is brutal when they get it going.
This is going to be a fun. The final 4 is fricking us but the SEC Champ is all that matters.
I must say your Auburn has me re thinking. Auburn is brutal when they get it going.
This is going to be a fun. The final 4 is fricking us but the SEC Champ is all that matters.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:35 pm to Neuromancer
We're having a good year. But I don't think we're to the point it's repeatable yearly.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:32 pm to the808bass
I don't know. In the East there is no Bama LSU A&M stuff. I know the East will rebuild but Mizzou seems to be taking a highflying act over there with some reruiting.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:44 pm to Neuromancer
If you have to ask where you stand in the Top 6, you don't deserved to be in it.
You have to earn it.
You have to earn it.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:55 pm to agswin
Get your nose out of the Rants arse and grow a pair.
Also learn to read. Its a ten year projection by the fans.
Nobody said we won the SEC there sport. But mabe some rant posters like you now.
Ive been living SEC longer than you have been alive. Or lucid.
They don't respect you for arse kissing. Speak your mind.
Also learn to read. Its a ten year projection by the fans.
Nobody said we won the SEC there sport. But mabe some rant posters like you now.
Ive been living SEC longer than you have been alive. Or lucid.
They don't respect you for arse kissing. Speak your mind.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:59 pm to Neuromancer
quote:
Get your nose out of the Rants arse and grow a pair.
Also learn to read. Its a ten year projection by the fans.
Nobody said we won the SEC there sport. But mabe some rant posters like you now.
Ive been living SEC longer than you have been alive. Or lucid.
They don't respect you for arse kissing. Speak your mind.
I don't respect you for putting LSU above Texas A&M. That is a farce of the highest order.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:01 pm to TeLeFaWx
A&M is learning what I have been telling them for 25 years. They finally are doing it. We are not there yet but are getting there.
So what is your top 6
So what is your top 6
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:04 pm to Neuromancer
quote:
A&M is learning what I have been telling them for 25 years. They finally are doing it. We are not there yet but are getting there.
False. Dynasty is already underway. LSU hasn't finished higher than us in a final poll since we've joined the SEC and they never will.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:05 pm to Neuromancer
quote:
I've been living SEC longer than you have been alive.
Whoa cowboy...calm down.
You wanna match Social Security checks?
It was a joke. Peace love and all of that.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:07 pm to Neuromancer
quote:
ok bro. you are right
Agreed.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:12 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
LSU hasn't finished higher than us in a final poll since we've joined the SEC and they never will.
Take that LSU.
You frickwads have been in the SEC for ONE WHOLE YEAR.
LSU is an SEC bell cow.
UGA is an SEC bell cow.
bama sucks but they are an SEC bell cow.
Auburn is a consistent SEC bell cow.
UF is a consistent SEC bell cow.
Every one of those programs, over a ten year period, will be at the top of the SEC standings, on a consistent basis. The rest of you fricks can fight for our table scraps. Good luck.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:14 pm to Neuromancer
Mizzou is hard to tell because, although our recruiting is whats really alarming, Pinkel's program has been doing more with less (i.e. using 3 star type players to create winning teams) for years now. This year, Michael Sam the SEC's sack leader and L'Damian Washington one of its top WRs are former 2 star guys. So the question becomes, does Pinkel's program sustain that.
More specifically, the question becomes how much of that was due to the depth of high school talent in the state of *Texas* and how does the depth there compare to the depth of high school talent in Florida and Georgia. Because for better or worse, that's what our coaching staff is doing now, is focusing on GA and FL as a main supplement to its local recruiting in Missouri, rather than using TX recruits for that purpose. We have found over and over that a 3 star or 2 star recruit from TX is often just as good a catch as a 4 star recruit from some other state (and I think you could say that programs like Baylor, Oklahoma State, TCU have validated that idea too).
But what happens if Pinkel starts trying to haul 3 star type guys from FL and GA and trying to coach them up per his formula? Will that work??? I don't know. I know it would be controversial as hell to ask the Rant if Texas high school football is just flat out superior to the high school football in Florida and Georgia, but Pinkel's program's place in the SEC over the next ten years probably hinges on the answer to that question.
More specifically, the question becomes how much of that was due to the depth of high school talent in the state of *Texas* and how does the depth there compare to the depth of high school talent in Florida and Georgia. Because for better or worse, that's what our coaching staff is doing now, is focusing on GA and FL as a main supplement to its local recruiting in Missouri, rather than using TX recruits for that purpose. We have found over and over that a 3 star or 2 star recruit from TX is often just as good a catch as a 4 star recruit from some other state (and I think you could say that programs like Baylor, Oklahoma State, TCU have validated that idea too).
But what happens if Pinkel starts trying to haul 3 star type guys from FL and GA and trying to coach them up per his formula? Will that work??? I don't know. I know it would be controversial as hell to ask the Rant if Texas high school football is just flat out superior to the high school football in Florida and Georgia, but Pinkel's program's place in the SEC over the next ten years probably hinges on the answer to that question.
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:15 pm to MrAUTigers
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 10:17 pm
Popular
Back to top

15







