Started By
Message
re: If SEC expands to 16 teams, what two teams would you pick?
Posted on 9/25/13 at 7:16 am to afatgreekcat
Posted on 9/25/13 at 7:16 am to afatgreekcat
The TV rationale may be changing. There has been some noise in congress for "a la carte" payment in cable. If that happens, The math changes a ton, and Missouri was a waste.
It would completely depend upon which school would have the most people willing to pay for the individual program, not just what school is in what state. Texas would be a huge addition (doubtful w Texas TV ), as would ND.
It would also mean Fla St, and Clemson would be viable choices. I'll leave it to someone else to rank which schools would be the biggest adds in that scenario.
It would completely depend upon which school would have the most people willing to pay for the individual program, not just what school is in what state. Texas would be a huge addition (doubtful w Texas TV ), as would ND.
It would also mean Fla St, and Clemson would be viable choices. I'll leave it to someone else to rank which schools would be the biggest adds in that scenario.
1
Posted on 9/25/13 at 7:29 pm to junior
quote:
The TV rationale may be changing. There has been some noise in congress for "a la carte" payment in cable. If that happens, The math changes a ton, and Missouri was a waste.
Your math is a waste. Missouri is the 4th most populous state in the SEC and has a stranglehold on whole state, football-wise. We're also 3rd in the SEC in per capita income and if you knew your TV rating habits, you'd know Missouri is a HUGE sports watching state - baseball, football, hockey, you name it.
Missouri was a GREAT get for the SEC as Mike Slive was well aware.
You need to research the facts before opening your yap.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News