Started By
Message

re: Realistically, how fricked is Bama?

Posted on 9/11/13 at 9:55 pm to
Posted by stickly
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2012
2338 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 9:55 pm to
The only solution that will ever work is a reciprocity-clause between the NFL and the NCAA that says a player that receives inappropriate benefits as an amateur will be penalized @ the next level (NFL). To be able to feel no penalty after years of breaking the rules is bullshite.

Of course, what makes more sense is to give p[layers a stipend that allows them to live the college-life of every other kid in college. Jesus, I am so sick of this *look* at college athletics.

And FYI, *no*, women's basketball, track and field, badminton, tennis, etc are not the same as football. Football makes money (in the SEC). Run this like a for-profit venture and the issues go away.

Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18348 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 9:56 pm to
Amen
Posted by stickly
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2012
2338 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 10:06 pm to
And to clarify my point, pick a measure that makes sense. Average the 'free-money/mom & dad $' that the top 20% of students get at each individual institution and that should be what revenue-producing players get per month as a stipend across all of the individual NCAA football programs.

If the average 'bama upper-middle-class coed gets $2850 in support-benefits then that is what the players should get.

Anyway, these kids (at real football schools) are helping generate a shite-ton of $ but they are too busy with football obligations to work and make $. There has to a better way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter