Started By
Message
re: Arkansas, Auburn, or Ole Miss...who replaces A&M?
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:00 pm to Sheetbend
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:00 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
A&M will continue to improve their overall talent level and will match Bama and LSU within the next 2 to 3 years.
You must not be familiar with A&M football history.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:14 pm to DWag215
A&M will be in the Number 1 spot in the SEC west - who cares who is in the third spot?
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:17 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
You must not be familiar with A&M football history.
How cute, yet another Arky fan clinging to A&M 1.0 in the A&M 2.0 era.
You will always have the memories!!!
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:18 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
How cute, yet another Arky fan clinging to A&M 1.0 in the A&M 2.0 era
you call one season an era? :
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:19 pm to piggilicious
A&M 1.0 - SWC and Big 12. Top 30 program.
A&M 2.0 - "Now With SEC Power (tm)." Top 15 program.
So the era currently is one season, but it will be the rest of your life.
A&M 2.0 - "Now With SEC Power (tm)." Top 15 program.
So the era currently is one season, but it will be the rest of your life.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:20 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
You must not be familiar with A&M football history.
Yes, our long and storied history in the SEC. Same ol' Aggy.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:20 pm to piggilicious
Of course! Aggies value integrity and academia above all.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:21 pm to ocelot4ark
Hog fans fricking HATE A&M
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:22 pm to cardboardboxer
Hmmm. Good luck with that.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:28 pm to fooz
quote:
Definitely not Arkansas. I'll go with Ole Miss. That's only if our squad of star QBs all get hurt though.
I don't really get it. Every spot in the SEC is an interchangeable thing. Are we going with historically? Because there's no point to go season by season since it will always change. I'd have to look at Ole Miss and aTm side by side. Arkansas is way ahead of both in terms of head to head and success, and Auburn is pretty far ahead of them all, historically. Auburn is only right behind LSU in those terms. Plus, Auburn has the more recent championship.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:30 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:I wasn't aware your university was a piece of software.
How cute, yet another Arky fan clinging to A&M 1.0 in the A&M 2.0 era.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:31 pm to Texas Tea
quote:Not really. It's more like the Hog posters on this board dislike the aTm posters on this board because they're shitty posters.
Hog fans fricking HATE A&M
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:31 pm to Texas Tea
Not really. You have one good player and not much else. You still won't win a championship, the west, and probably won't even make a BCS bowl with him which is really sad. We're better in everything that counts. Head to head wins and historical success.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:32 pm to Choctaw
Arkansas is already 3rd in the west, right below Bama and LSu
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:32 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Arkansas is way ahead of both in terms of head to head and success
Fire up the Delorean! We got a Hog fan who wants to take a trip back in time!
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:33 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:we have more wins, a higher winning percentage, more bowl wins, a better bowl winning percentage, and more conference championships even before you left the SWC
historical success.
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:34 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
we have more wins, a higher winning percentage, more bowl wins, a better bowl winning percentage, and more conference championships even before you left the SWC
Oh snap
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:35 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:And still can't win more than 1/3 of the head to head. Talk about being someone's daddy.
we have more wins, a higher winning percentage, more bowl wins, a better bowl winning percentage, and more conference championships even before you left the SWC
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:35 pm to Drewbie
My point had nothing to do with the head to head
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News