Started By
Message
Targeting = Ejection
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:11 am
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:11 am
Was called in the A&M game and their guy was ejected.
You think we will see many more of these calls this season?
You think we will see many more of these calls this season?
6
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:19 am to Stuttgart Tiger
Hopefully not. I like muschamps idea of reviewing the film after the game and then making the ruling on intent.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 8:20 am to Stuttgart Tiger
Yes, especially considering the fact that the hit was not targeting. The hit was shoulder-to-chest after the ball was popped up in the air. Terrible call, and a preview of the BS that will pervade the season.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:45 am to Stuttgart Tiger
There was a really BS call last night of targeting in the Cal game. LB led with his shoulder just below the QB's helmet. He was ejected.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 10:51 am to Stuttgart Tiger
Yeah I think this rule just sets up for a ref to make a bad call early in a game and you lose an important player for the game due to it.
It should be no ejections and a post game ruling on whether or not it deserves a suspension for the next game.
It should be no ejections and a post game ruling on whether or not it deserves a suspension for the next game.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 10:54 am to Stuttgart Tiger
I don't see this rule sticking. That ATM ejection was BS.
Refs gone Ref.
Refs gone Ref.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 11:05 am to Stuttgart Tiger
quote:
You think we will see many more of these calls this season?
There were at least two yesterday so probably.
And it's a real shame. Another rule added will be misused/abused all season because it depends upon the objectivity of the referee making the call. Chances are those things will never get overturned either because the guys in the booth are going to have the backs of the guys on the field.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News