Started By
Message

re: Regarding vacated wins, etc

Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:52 pm to
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15971 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:52 pm to
This hypothetical situation will likely never happen, but if losses are not vacated the undefeated team with vacated wins would be at the top of the standings by winning %
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86555 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

but if losses are not vacated the undefeated team with vacated wins would be at the top of the standings by winning %


Wins are vacated, losses aren't. If aTm plays manziel for 6 games, then he is ruled ineligible, their conference record will be 0-0 after 6 games. If they win their last 2 SEC games without manziel, their record would 2-0. However, there are other teams in the west who would have accumulated 6,7, or even 8 SEC wins, and would win the division. It's not based on winning percentage, like multiple people have told you.

Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8605 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:10 pm to
I don't know why they ever decided vacated wins a good idea. A vacated win should be a loss and a win for the losing team. That's proper payment for cheating.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter