Started By
Message

re: PP7 still mad, pals. Oh he still real mad......

Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83743 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:01 pm to
Ok I just watched the game tape. Knowing what I know now I'd 100% give him the INT after watching the replay. At the time it was definitely in LSU's favor...but it wasnt 100%. I'd say 95% chance he was in from the original video. I'd probably give it to em. I guess replay refs have to be 100% sure though.
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm
Posted by MetryTyger
Metro NOLA, LA
Member since Jan 2004
15608 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm to
And it didn't help that the Replay Official in the press box was an Alabama grad...Gee, I wonder what call I should make ????
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36267 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm to
To be overturned they have to DEFINITE proof. If it had been called a INT originally it would have stayed a INT.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter