Started By
Message

re: Bret Beilema #1 coach to boost BCS chances for a School according to study.

Posted on 7/24/13 at 10:39 am to
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42397 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 10:39 am to
There was more to the formula than what the team did before they took over.

CUM is up there on both lists and he took over Florida and Ohio St. programs that had been successful before his arrival.

If you would read the article it would make sense to you, maybe.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19260 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:09 am to
quote:

There was more to the formula than what the team did before they took over.


Well if there is a formula, and Saban isn't near the top...then the formula is flawed.

quote:

If you would read the article it would make sense to you, maybe.


I didn't say the article didn't make sense...I just said that the premise is incorrect.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19260 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

In part two of our analysis we looked at incremental participation rates in BCS bowl games (not just the BCS championship). Our approach was similar as in the winning percentage analysis and used the same set of predictor variables. On this metric, the top performer was Bret Bielema. Bielema’s record includes taking Wisconsin to the last three Rose Bowls. In terms of percentages, we find that with Bielema in charge, Wisconsin improved their rate of BCS bowl participation by 28%. It looks like Arkansas made a great choice! In positions two through five we have Chris Petersen, Bob Stoops, Frank Beamer and Urban Meyer. And where does Coach Saban fall? Just behind Urban Meyer in 6th place.


Wisconsin doesn't go to a BCS bowl last year if either Penn State or Ohio State had not been on probation...so, by their logic, Bielemia's ability to get Arkansas to a bowl game would be diminished in a conference where every team is bowl eligible. Either that or they believe that solely by his presence, the liklihood that two SEC West teams will not be bowl eligible is increased.

If you take into account that Wisconsin went to the Rose Bowl in 2010 because of Big 10 rules, then his stock drops further. Michigan State had the same record (both in conference and overall), and won the head-to-head match-up...but the Big 10 sends the highest ranked team as their BCS representative. In the SEC, the winner of the head-to-head matchup gets the nod in post-season play...so, in the SEC...Bielema would have only gone to 1 BCS game, instead of 3.

So, where it is true that Bielema raised Wisconsin's chances of participating in a BCS bowl, the same relative performance within the guidelines and history of the SEC would have resulted in a 66% lower BCS bowl participation.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter