Started By
Message
re: Vanderbilt rape investigation update
Posted on 7/10/13 at 4:35 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
Posted on 7/10/13 at 4:35 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
To me, it's the fact that Vandy dismissed them and barred them from campus. They didn't just suspend them while an investigation was taking place. They booted them off the team, and out of school. The only time I can remember Mizzou acting that harshly, and that quickly, the guy went to prison for sexual assault.
If they weren't pretty sure, they'd have just suspended them and let it play out until the investigation was complete.
If they weren't pretty sure, they'd have just suspended them and let it play out until the investigation was complete.
3
Posted on 7/10/13 at 4:37 pm to semotruman
Very valid point. I am not trying to convince anyone here. Just laying the foundation for my "provacative" thoughts on the matter.
Posted on 7/10/13 at 4:41 pm to semotruman
A lot of colleges will dismiss a person accused and not even prosecuted. I was privy to such an event in our dorm. The guy was accused and he had to go before a committee that excused him after hearing both their stories. It happened in her dorm room and with no witnesses and both parties intoxicated. Most colleges will immediately dismiss. I just don't know how it works for schollie football players in the SEC though.
Posted on 7/10/13 at 5:36 pm to semotruman
quote:
If they weren't pretty sure, they'd have just suspended them and let it play out until the investigation was complete.
Duke was so sure that they kicked out the players, got rid of the coach, and disbanded the team. All based on a lie.
Just playing devil's advocate here. We really don't know anything yet.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News