Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: Which SEC program is best built for long-term success in football?
Posted on 6/14/13 at 1:15 am to WhiskeyBent
Posted on 6/14/13 at 1:15 am to WhiskeyBent
quote:
Auburn you are 0-3 vs A&M . Auburn is A&M's bitch. Apparently A&M's prior conference titles dont count - but head to heads do. So thank god for Auburn. Yall kept it within a few touchdowns with Bo though Good game.
*sigh*
Not to defend Auburn, but...
They have 3 Heisman winners (to Texas A&M's 2), 2 AP titles (to Texas A&M's 1), and has a higher all-time winning % and a MUCH better record in the post-season. Historically, they've been better.
Head-to-head is nice, but it's not going to sway anyone to your argument. That first win was in 1911... and the second was back in 1986. 1 game in the last 25 years is hardly indicative, and came at Auburn's lowest point in quite a while.
1
Posted on 6/14/13 at 1:50 am to skrayper
A&M spent as much for their Football Only strength training facility as Bama spent on their facility for All Sports.
In addition the A&M facility has technology no other SEC team has.
Notice the Bama players trying to tap out during the A&M game?
The idea that Bama has any sort of Long Term competitive advantage is horsesh*t.
They have another pretty good SEC team in their state to compete with.
In addition the A&M facility has technology no other SEC team has.
Notice the Bama players trying to tap out during the A&M game?
The idea that Bama has any sort of Long Term competitive advantage is horsesh*t.
They have another pretty good SEC team in their state to compete with.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News