Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: Which SEC program is best built for long-term success in football?
Posted on 6/12/13 at 1:26 pm to RebelFreeze48
Posted on 6/12/13 at 1:26 pm to RebelFreeze48
Georgia fan - it sounds like there is a similarity with your administration and the Texas A&M administration during the RC Slocum era. The old Ags loved him and the still do - but the truth is he wasted A&M's chance to win a couple of Natty's because he cant coach offense. We had a cake schedule for abot a decade with the most brutal Defenses youve ever seen. Nobody ever scored on us. so we had like 10-1 years and would lose to Tulsa to stay out of Natty or tie SMU. We always lost Bowl games if we played an equal or better team. But we were hesitant to make a change. Finally we have new culture. Progressive, with emphasis on Branding.
It appears Ga. is having more success and against better comp. but seems like a similar situation.
Do you agree?
It appears Ga. is having more success and against better comp. but seems like a similar situation.
Do you agree?
1
Posted on 6/12/13 at 1:35 pm to WhiskeyBent
I think UG has the most profitable athletic dept in the country, but they'd rather sit on the money than spend what they could.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News