Started By
Message

re: Florida to rotate onto Alabama's schedule in 2014?

Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:14 pm to
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Or get suckered in. Either way, grow up and stop your bitching. The crying is what makes you such an easy mark.


I might be an easy mark, but my facts have never been proven wrong--ignored, but never proven wrong.
Posted by BamaStud
Memphis
Member since Nov 2011
238 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:25 pm to
Easy mark. Check out the past 100 years of FL vs. Bama. This trend will continue in the long term. Smile and enjoy recent FL success. Bama will eat it and devour it. Times series analysis shows this. Could it change? Sure, but doubt it bit time in the face of statistics.
Posted by LukeSidewalker
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Dec 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:25 pm to
Boris, is that you? You are a tender hearted troll...I have a fact for you, Alabama has as many titles in the last four years then Florida has ever. You need to do your history before trying to state facts that only pertain to a small stint in CFB as a whole, you are dumb.
This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 9:27 pm
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:26 pm to
You have the same facts everyone does. Why would an acorn fan even entertain a discussion about schedules?
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Easy mark. Check out the past 100 years of FL vs. Bama.
Why do you think the Bear Bryant era has anyting to do with present day?

Florida has more in-state talent than Bama; It has a coach trained in Saban's defense; It now has a more sophisticated offense than Bama.

Bama has a better QB this year, but all that goes away after this year, so stop with the 100 year B.S.

Posted by BamaStud
Memphis
Member since Nov 2011
238 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:54 pm to
PROTEGES ARE NOT THE MASTER. CHECK IT OUT WITH BEAR AND SABAN. And, to think Muschamp has a more sophisticated offense than Saban (with the west cost dude), then I firmly disagree. 100 year B.S. controls predictions. Have you ever studied statistics and probability at FL? LOL. Doesn't really matter I guess. You can hope I guess (like a child).
Posted by LukeSidewalker
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Dec 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 9:54 pm to
You can erase the entire bear era and our last 5 years and history will still show we are better than florida and lsu. Like I said, do your history. It has nothing to do with favortism. You have a bomb shelter I'm sure.
Posted by LukeSidewalker
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Dec 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:10 pm to
You can erase the entire bear era and our last 5 years and history will still show we are better than florida and lsu. Like I said, do your history. It has nothing to do with favortism. You have a bomb shelter I'm sure.
Posted by BamaStud
Memphis
Member since Nov 2011
238 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:11 pm to
Correct LukeSidewalker.

I dare not introduce statistics into this conversation. LOL. How dare me?

Point ... blank point ... 100 years ... point ... Bama dominates ... even more so in the last 5 years ... numbers indicate what they indicate ... BAMA ... nothing else ... LOL
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15112 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

Florida has more in-state talent than Bama;


There is usually enough really good talent in Alabama to form a great foundation for any recruiting class. Plus Bama's location next to fertile recruiting grounds in GA & FL, along with it's historic ability to pull a couple kids out of LA & MS is more than enough to match UF in recruiting.

quote:

It now has a more sophisticated offense than Bama.




I know that you don't like for your precious Tigers to have to play UF every year, and UF will be in the top tier of the SEC for the foreseeable future due to their location, but there is no proof out there that they will ever surpass Bama as the top SEC football program from a historical standpoint.
This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 10:37 pm
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

You can erase the entire bear era and our last 5 years and history will still show we are better than florida...
Since 1991, Flordia has won the SEC 8 times while Bama has won it 4 times--over 20 years of history.

Erase the last 5 years, and Florida leads 7 to 2 SEC titles.

You need to get your facts straight before you try to distort them.
This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 10:53 pm
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

You need to get your facts straight before you try to distort them.


quote:

Since 1991


You mean like deciding to judge two programs based on a completely arbitrary time frame instead of -- I dunno -- all-time?

Deciding to base a judgement on a time frame which begins with the start of Florida's golden era, and happens to include one of the worst runs in Alabama history seems more than a little biased in favor of Florida, don't you think?

Here's an exercise -- do the same research, but start the time frame at 1925.







This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 11:02 pm
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

You mean like deciding to judge two programs based on a completely arbitrary time frame instead of -- I dunno -- all-time?


What time frame would you pick to determine when the SEC started to become the dominate football conference?

Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

What time frame would you pick to determine when the SEC started to become the dominate football conference?

Refresh and scroll up. We'll say the beginning was back when the SEC first became relevant on the national stage.
This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 11:03 pm
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:04 pm to
So you want to talk about when the SEC became relevent, but not dominate. Why?
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

So you want to talk about when the SEC became relevent, but not dominate. Why?

Because the SEC has had periods of dominance prior to the last twenty years.

Granted, not a hegemony on the scale that it is now, but it could be argued that the SEC had periods of dominance during the 60s and 70s.

Why forsake giant swaths of history for the sake of a patently historical discussion?
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:11 pm to
Is it time for whale vagina arse pics yet? Text me at BR549.
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Is it time for whale vagina arse pics yet? Text me at BR549.


Well, Sheetbend is active and is hating Alabama as per the status quo, so we might need to break out the arse pics before long.
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Because the SEC has had periods of dominance prior to the last twenty years.


OK, so what is your point?

Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 11:16 pm to
June 23. Only 60+ days.




Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter