Started By
Message
re: A&M AD misspeaks: Oregon apparently back on. USC-w not.
Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:21 am to bigDgator
Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:21 am to bigDgator
quote:
You realize the only reason we made it to the Natty game in 2006 and 2008 was beacuase our schedule was more difficult than the other teams being considered? I guess you probably don't.
I did...which is why I used UF as an example. The SEC and FSU made your schedule more difficult without the need to add these early season "for the fans"games.
2
Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:25 am to parkjas2001
Arky fans posting about our OOC scheduling is pretty funny.
Your OOC schedule this year went a combined 16-20 last year and includes that Southern Conference powerhouse Samford. Take care of business before talking shite.
Your OOC schedule this year went a combined 16-20 last year and includes that Southern Conference powerhouse Samford. Take care of business before talking shite.
Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:35 am to parkjas2001
quote:
I did...which is why I used UF as an example. The SEC and FSU made your schedule more difficult without the need to add these early season "for the fans"games.
That is not what you said. You said UF won the natties with weak OOC scheduling. Which is incorrect. We always have at least decent OOC scheduling compared to other schools. In 2008 we played Miami and FSU at the beginning and end of our schedule.
Slive knows that when it comes down to the final determination of who gets in the playoff, strength of schedule will be very important, and with other conferences going to nine games, the SEC needs to make sure they have at least one highly ranked OOC team to keep an advantage.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News