Started By
Message

re: Vote to keep 8 game schedule was 13-1

Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26993 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Dr RC
Vote to keep 8 game schedule was 13-1
quote:
Thanks for the info about the McNeese State game. So aTm has an FCS game scheduled before they ever came into the SEC. I wasn't aware of that. So basically what you're finally admitting to is that aTm was playing FCS teams before they ever came into the SEC, and the issue of playing FCS teams isn't merely a problem with the SEC not following suit with the other conferences.


I never said playing FCS teams is an SEC issue.

I said playing them LATE in the season is something that seems to only happen in the SEC.

Most teams in other conferences tend to get their OOC out of the way early in the year so its much more likely that you won't have nearly an entire conference all playing an FCS game on the same day.

But when everyone in the SEC saves a spot for a non rivalry OOC game late in the year you are almost always going to have to play an FCS team b/c damn near every other school in the nation will be playing a conference game and is unavailable.


The point is that we shouldn't be playing FCS teams at all...early, late, whenever. Whether it's the SEC because they save an OOC game for late in the year, or because teams like aTm pre-SEC wanted to play them just for the sake of playing them, it makes no difference. Most SEC fans seem to like playing conference games as early as we do. Playing a 9th game, especially if it's the next to last game of the year, will help eliminate the FCS games.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25806 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

he point is that we shouldn't be playing FCS teams at all...early, late, whenever. Whether it's the SEC because they save an OOC game for late in the year, or because teams like aTm pre-SEC wanted to play them just for the sake of playing them, it makes no difference. Most SEC fans seem to like playing conference games as early as we do. Playing a 9th game, especially if it's the next to last game of the year, will help eliminate the FCS games.


Why does anyone care about how good (or bad) the worst team on a schedule is?

Shouldn't the focus be on the other 11 games? Or 10 games at the least?

I'll never understand why schools pick on eachother because they are giving a payday to another school.

Who cares?

If we're going to measure dicks, then start with the biggest games on the schedule and go from there.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58133 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Playing a 9th game, especially if it's the next to last game of the year, will help eliminate the FCS games.


It absolutely would NOT help eliminate FCS games.

It will simply kill games against mid majors and make it harder to set up games against power BCS teams.

The only thing that would stop SEC schools (this goes for all conferences BTW) from playing FCS schools would be a conference mandate against them like the Big Ten claims will happen in the next few years.
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

The point is that we shouldn't be playing FCS teams at all...early, late, whenever.

seems if that was the point, then someone would introduce a proposal to outlaw FCS games like the B1G just did

I agree though and wish that had been the proposal rather than the 9 game slate. I hate those games.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter