Started By
Message
re: No suspension for Dial
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:10 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:10 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Because the SEC already stated the hit was not legal and should have been penalized.
For a hit to the facemask yes. I was referring to all the people who think he should be suspended because Murray was defenseless, which he was not.
The refs missed a flag, but that doesnt mean he should be suspended. SEC agrees with that.
2
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:12 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
doesnt mean he should be suspended.
Ok. I agree there. I never thought it warranted a suspension.
But the hit was not legal, as stated by the SEC, and should have drawn a flag for an illegal hit.
To argue otherwise is laughable, like many gumps that post here.
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:27 am to TreyAnastasio
Murray was not defenseless but it certainly was helmet to helmet and also could have been unnecessary roughness.
Warranted a penalty but not a suspension.
Warranted a penalty but not a suspension.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News