Started By
Message

re: So what was the defensive scheme that shut down JFF

Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:13 am to
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66512 posts
Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:13 am to
Once Chavis went to the Mustang Package, it was all over.
Posted by Tigers'Mojo
Atlanta, GA
Member since Sep 2012
685 posts
Posted on 11/6/12 at 3:12 am to
What WR's are considered two of teh top 4 exactly that play for aTm?
Posted by HMFIC
Member since Jul 2012
51 posts
Posted on 11/6/12 at 3:30 am to
quote:

Kliff has corrected this and will now run it right down your throat with only 4-5 defenders in the box.


I went back and looked at the last three games, when LSU went to a 3 man front inexorably KK didn’t use the RB’s more. No one is sure why. But the offense stalled out over the course of the game as LSU adjusted to the passing game and A&M didn’t switch it up. After that game, the RB attempts and consequently the rushing yardage shot up for Auburn and MSU (I realize there are significant talent differences). But I think the evidence supports it.

In the LSU game A&M had a significant number of 3 man front’s but only rushed (RB’s not Manziel) 20 times out of 94 for a total of 109 yards.

Auburn(without Manziel) RB carries went up to 35 out of 81 offensive plays and generated 256 yards.

Against MSU the RB carries fell to 32 out of 97 and generated 188 yards.

The A&M RB’s aren’t slouches, going into the season it was generally thought that they were one of the best RB units in CFB.

tl;dr When A&M uses its RB’s in the offense more it generates greater offensive productivity.
This post was edited on 11/6/12 at 3:46 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter