Started By
Message
re: 270 yards passing is why A&M lost!
Posted on 10/25/12 at 8:43 am to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 10/25/12 at 8:43 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Generally, teams that play close games are on par with each other.
A&M is on par with Ole Miss then.
Certainly auburn at 1-6 is on par with LSU at 7-1.
LSU and A&M played a close game, but the programs are galaxies away in accomplishments and overall prestige.
4
Posted on 10/25/12 at 8:44 am to r2d2
quote:
Certainly auburn at 1-6 is on par with LSU at 7-1
Um, what was the LSU-Auburn score, Sparky? Not sure I'd use this as a nugget in my debate.
Posted on 10/25/12 at 8:45 am to r2d2
quote:
A&M is on par with Ole Miss then.
Certainly auburn at 1-6 is on par with LSU at 7-1.
LSU and A&M played a close game, but the programs are galaxies away in accomplishments and overall prestige.
This. Some of them are trying so hard to justify the loss. Typical we made mistakes LSU didn't beat us type talk. They will get another shot next year. Good luck until then.
Posted on 10/25/12 at 8:49 am to r2d2
quote:
A&M is on par with Ole Miss then.
Not denying this.
quote:
LSU and A&M played a close game
Which is what is implied by "on par."
quote:
but the programs are galaxies away in accomplishments and overall prestige.
Now you're changing the argument. What I meant was that on October 20, 2012, the LSU and A&M football squads were very close to even on the gridiron. That's not a fact to get your panties in a wad over, and it's not a moral victory for A&M.
Posted on 10/25/12 at 9:38 am to r2d2
quote:
the programs are galaxies away in accomplishments and overall prestige.
FWIW, you get no points for previous accomplishments or overall prestige when playing a game.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News