Started By
Message

re: I have changed

Posted on 10/13/12 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by Sandwich
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5549 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 12:33 pm to
Just let this sink in:

Notre Dame, USCe, Stanford, West Virginia,FSU, Clemson, and a ton of other schools are more relevant then UGA. Just let that fricking shite sink in....mother....fricker.
Posted by Whopper Dawg
TN
Member since Sep 2012
257 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Notre Dame, USCe, Stanford, West Virginia,FSU, Clemson, and a ton of other schools are more relevant then UGA. Just let that fricking shite sink in....mother....fricker.


True, and they don't care, let that sink in. Ain't no heat coming richie's way as long as be beats the lessers and tech.

Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Just let this sink in:

Notre Dame, USCe, Stanford, West Virginia,FSU, Clemson, and a ton of other schools are more relevant then UGA. Just let that fricking shite sink in....mother....fricker.



It's all about coaching. ND, FSU and Clemson are good examples of teams like UGA that have tremendous resources but who have consistently underachieved over the last 10 years. In sharp contrast, SC and particularly WVU are teams who have done more with less. Our problem is we have never been able to do more with more with the exception of 1980 with Herschel.

The OP nails the crux of the issue. UGA has never had a truly great coach because our admins are satisfied with a coach of sound character who wins just enough to keep the donations rolling in. As long as our football program remains one of the most profitable in the nation, our situation won't change.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter