Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss one of the most prolific offenses in the nation?
Posted on 10/10/12 at 7:07 am to diggidydog
Posted on 10/10/12 at 7:07 am to diggidydog
quote:
CBS has you ranked 42nd in total offense...this after playing a FCS team, the 87th, 70th,107th, 1st and 43rd ranked defenses.
You're too dumb to understand the OP's link.
What you're linking is most likely something like total yards a game or total points a game (total offense v. scoring offense). The link that Pank or whoever it was that started this thread gave is more in depth than that.
So saying "well according to so-and-so" as if this is somehow a matter of opinion is fricking dumb. It's a matter of how the idea of a "prolific offense" is determined. By just raw yards and points, we're definitely not a top offense, but that's not what this is. The page linked looks at metrics like "success rate" and "points per play", and adjusts them to account for strength of schedule. In doing that, it is revealed that we are one of the nation's most prolific offenses.
What all of this means is not that "Ole Miss puts up yards and points," but rather "Ole Miss moves the ball well against good defenses, therefore their offense is good."
Follow that link. If numbers are something you understand (a long shot, I know), then you'll see what we're getting it.
Of course, I shouldn't expect your dumb arse to understand the nuances of these sorts of thing anyway.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 7:14 am
0
Posted on 10/10/12 at 7:11 am to DWag215
Harris muffed it and JF fumbled because they panicked when they saw pressure. Stop acting like the OM defenders didn't have anything to do with it.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 7:13 am
Posted on 10/10/12 at 7:44 am to beHop
quote:
Harris muffed it and JF fumbled because they panicked when they saw pressure.
No he muffed the punt because he fricked up and didn't bring it in, truth be told he he really shouldn't have gone for it (I think it was on the 8).
Also Ole Miss looked good but I thought it was yalls D that shined, not the O. Cody Prewitt comes to mind.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 7:45 am
Posted on 10/10/12 at 7:47 am to GalvoAg
quote:
Cody Prewitt comes to mind.
Probably because he was the first one to hit Harris after the muff. Prewitt staaaaaaacked Harris muuuuuufffffed.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:54 am to matthew25
I think it will be a close game unless Auburn players have quit. I will say OM 27-24.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:03 pm to diggidydog
quote:
I think it will be a close game
LOLNO
We're going to fricking decimate Auburn. shite won't be fair.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:32 pm to DCRebel
quote:
Pick another crazy four things on the other side of the ball and we could have won by 50. WTF are you talking about? Your turnovers weren't freak events. It was your QB throwing picks when getting hit and your runners fumbling the ball when they got the shite knocked out of them. If we played tomorrow would y'all turn the ball over 6 times? No. Would it be another nail biter? Yes.
quote:Well, your prolific offense got six turnovers and lost by 3.
We have one of the most prolific offenses in the nation
OM performed better than expected and like I said will probably get better. I understand the want and or need to count this one as a moral victory- but you got stuffed on a 4th down, you couldn't hold Texas A&M's offense out of the endzone when they had to have 6, and we took the ball to end the game. That friends is a loss, and when you gaze again at the all time winning percentage against Texas A&M it is still .000.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:35 pm to 13-0 Branding Iron
quote:
again at the all time winning percentage against Texas A&M it is still .000.
Things nobody gives a shite about for $500, Alex.
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News