Started By
Message
locked post

How many seasons until aTm & Mizzou's OOC losses count against the SEC's rep?

Posted on 7/12/12 at 9:58 pm
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
58086 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 9:58 pm
I'm saying 4 seasons. That's 4 seasons to take advantage of the new recruiting weapon and 4 seasons to learn the new style of play. I just picture a lot of "Meh, they're adopted." responses to SEC flames if/when either team loses to a team from another conference the next couple of years.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65985 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 9:59 pm to
Mother frick Patrick another shitty thread?

F U C K
Posted by Palooza11
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
2561 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 9:59 pm to
Yea, we won't be losing any OOC kthanks
Posted by MagicCityBlazer
Member since Nov 2010
3686 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 10:01 pm to
Does it matter? The SEC is going to have detractors regardless.

SEC sets the standard and the rest follow.
right?
Posted by BrocraticMethod
a dumpster
Member since Sep 2011
2326 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 10:03 pm to
You talk like it's just a given that they're going to be getting plowed in OOC games regularly.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 10:03 pm to
I mean look at Arkansas. Whether they were getting lucky against the Aggies or getting their salad tosses by Mizzou, no one considered them to be a representative of the SEC's strength because they have never once in 20 years been able to even sniff a conference title. In a couple years when A&M is competing for winning the conference, then their out of conference games mater. Does anyone look at Iowa State's OOC record to judge the Big 12? No, because they are the Arkansas of the SEC. Does that make sense?
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 10:35 pm to
Since 2004, Arkansas has been blown out by Texas (52-10), Missouri (38-7), USC (50-14), and USC (70-17), as well as closer losses to Texas, Ohio State and Wisconsin. I don't think you have much room to talk about OOC losses.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9530 posts
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:16 pm to
FWIW, we're 21-3 in non-conf. and bowl games in the past five years (would be 23-1 if we hadn't iced our own kicker against ASU or given up a pick six in the fourth quarter against Iowa), so hopefully we won't be letting down anyone too often if we can continue along those lines.
This post was edited on 7/12/12 at 11:19 pm
Posted by 19auburn49
Alabama
Member since Apr 2011
286 posts
Posted on 7/13/12 at 9:36 am to
Lol one of them will finish better than Arky this year
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 7/13/12 at 10:22 am to
Um....yeah. Obvious troll is obvious.

The reason the SEC has its reputation is not because of the losses racked up by Vandy, Ole Miss, or Arkie in OOC. The SEC has WON the BCS NC 6 years in a row. A&M and Mizzou could both come in and be door mats, and as long as LSU, Bama, Georgia, Florida, or Tennessee continue to have NFL rosters top to bottom, the SEC will keep its prestige.

Now, with regard to the Pigs at Kyle, I think we have as good a chance to win as last year (should have won...by a lot). The game was in question until the last few minutes, at a neutral venue. Yeah, new staff, new QB, etc., but the core of the team is still here.

I give A&M an advantage because of the venue, but Arkie an equalizing advantage with Tyler Wilson (who is a badass and a future starting NFL QB). It will probably play out just like last year's game. Lots of points, down to the last possession.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 10:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter