Started By
Message
re: If Penn State Scandal occurred in the SEC , would we support a ban?
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:23 pm to WDE24
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:23 pm to WDE24
You are back tracking:
I focused on the duties imposed by this:
You disingenuously in attempt to mock me looked at the ennumerated list to determine that it wasn't applicable without reviewing or intentionally omitting this:
Just admit that I read it broader than you did (assuming you even read it all) and Emmert agrees with me. You trying to defend being unduly snarky to someone that has shown you respect in this debate is pretty sad.
I focused on the duties imposed by this:
quote:
Individuals employed by (or associated with) a member institution to administer, conduct or coach intercollegiate athletics and all participating student-athletes shall act with honesty and sportsmanship at all times so that intercollegiate athletics as a whole, their institutions and they, as individuals, shall represent the honor and dignity of fair play and the generally recognized high standards associated with wholesome competitive sports.
You disingenuously in attempt to mock me looked at the ennumerated list to determine that it wasn't applicable without reviewing or intentionally omitting this:
quote:
Unethical conduct by a prospective or enrolled student-athlete or a current or former institutional staff member
(e.g., coach, professor, tutor, teaching assistant, student manager, student trainer) may include, but is not limited
to, the following:
Just admit that I read it broader than you did (assuming you even read it all) and Emmert agrees with me. You trying to defend being unduly snarky to someone that has shown you respect in this debate is pretty sad.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 1:26 pm
1
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:36 pm to therick711
quote:No, I am not. I have been pretty consistent.
You are back tracking:
quote:No, I said the rules don't really cover this unless you want to include the general statement. Which is true.
You disingenuously in attempt to mock me looked at the ennumerated list to determine that it wasn't applicable without reviewing or intentionally omitting this:
Also, you didn't answer either of my questions. Being honest, did you actually read the rule book before posting that rule or just Emmert's letter?
quote:If you read the rule book (which I did) and Emmert's letter, you see that even Emmert has to acknowledge the stretch being made. Sure, he can do it because the rule is vague enough, but a fair reading of the rule book would not encompass covering this incident. Which, frankly, isn't surprising because who would ever have considered something like this could happen.
Just admit that I read it broader than you did (assuming you even read it all) and Emmert agrees with me.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News