Started By
Message
re: If Penn State Scandal occurred in the SEC , would we support a ban?
Posted on 7/13/12 at 11:27 am to WDE24
Posted on 7/13/12 at 11:27 am to WDE24
quote:
No deterrence is both for the offender and others. As to the offender, the term used is specific deterrence. As to others, the term is general deterrence.
You have identified they can be (imprecisely) used as synonyms, not that they are the same thing. The fact that two different categories exist to explain the phenomenon proves they are not the same thing. Further the fact that my post was using two different terms to describe different goals shows they aren't the same thing.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 11:29 am
1
Posted on 7/13/12 at 11:33 am to therick711
Usually, when the term deterrence is used without specificity in the legal world it refers to both specific and general.
Anyway, I don't see where the goals you listed have not and are not being accomplished without the NCAA stretching the bounds of its role and authority to deal with this situation. I just think the NCAA isn't the right forum to deal with something so serious.
Again, I see why people are asking for this and don't really care, I am just of the opinion that the NCAA should stay out of it.
Anyway, I don't see where the goals you listed have not and are not being accomplished without the NCAA stretching the bounds of its role and authority to deal with this situation. I just think the NCAA isn't the right forum to deal with something so serious.
Again, I see why people are asking for this and don't really care, I am just of the opinion that the NCAA should stay out of it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News