Started By
Message

re: If Penn State Scandal occurred in the SEC , would we support a ban?

Posted on 7/13/12 at 11:12 am to
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 7/13/12 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Deterrence refers to the social goal of preventing other would be offenders. Preventing rescidvism is aimed at preventing the same offender.
No deterrence is both for the offender and others. As to the offender, the term used is specific deterrence. As to others, the term is general deterrence.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 7/13/12 at 11:27 am to
quote:

No deterrence is both for the offender and others. As to the offender, the term used is specific deterrence. As to others, the term is general deterrence.


You have identified they can be (imprecisely) used as synonyms, not that they are the same thing. The fact that two different categories exist to explain the phenomenon proves they are not the same thing. Further the fact that my post was using two different terms to describe different goals shows they aren't the same thing.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 11:29 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter