Started By
Message

re: The SEC Big Six vs. The SEC Big Six in the Modern Era

Posted on 6/5/12 at 9:35 pm to
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
3237 posts
Posted on 6/5/12 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

I've seen the mark of the modern era determined by things such as the use of full facemasks (1951) and the coaches poll, which was 1950.


Sorry, but the modern era of SEC football has to be an era that included black athletes. When 80% of the starters for SEC football programs in 2011 were black, then the acceptance of black players in SEC schools is the beginning of the "modern era". Any other definition is totally and completely worthless.

Bama's first black player played in 1971. For, LSU it was 1972. That is the beginning of the modern era of SEC football.
Posted by Bellabama
Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnipresent
Member since Nov 2009
30878 posts
Posted on 6/5/12 at 11:05 pm to
Sorry, that's just your opinion. I was using a point of reference that I've seen used before. It's often used because there was a gap of flux caused by WW2, and it represents a period of time that wasn't marked by any major changes...

Besides... I grew up hearing people I love and admire who played football in the 60's talking about their stories, and I refuse to accept that they aren't "modern". It's not like they are THAT old, or played in the 20's.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72339 posts
Posted on 6/5/12 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Bama's first black player played in 1971. For, LSU it was 1972. That is the beginning of the modern era of SEC football.



But Kentucky and Arkansas had them sooner. Alabama had black walk-on as early as 1967. That isn't exactly the best standard to have a cut-off for the "modern era". It's going to be different for most every program.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter