The 93 season was wiped out because Antonio Langham signed a contract on a napkin with an agent at a bar after winning the NCG. He then denied having any contact with the agent, and played the '93 season.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Crow Pie

Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center

Member since Feb 2010

25428 posts

Posted on 1/4/12 at 11:08 pm to crimson crazy

quote:
The 93 season was wiped out because Antonio Langham signed a contract on a napkin with an agent at a bar after winning the NCG. He then denied having any contact with the agent, and played the '93 season

quote:
The N.C.A.A. Committee on Infractions cited three principal violations:

*Contrary to N.C.A.A. rules, an Alabama player accepted six loans from boosters in 1989 and 1990. The loans, totaling $24,400, were never repaid.

*Another player was allowed to play in 11 regular-season games in 1993 although he had signed with an agent. The N.C.A.A. said Alabama officials did not pursue the matter diligently and did not notify the N.C.A.A. until almost 11 months after the signing.

*The university's faculty athletics representative gave the N.C.A.A. "false and misleading information."

I suggest you contact (or sue) the New York Times and request they update their information to reflect the truth as you now currently see it.

www.revisehistoryatthenytimes.com

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Govt Tide

Member since Nov 2009

9145 posts

Posted on 1/5/12 at 8:59 am to crimson crazy

quote:
The 93 season was wiped out because Antonio Langham signed a contract on a napkin with an agent at a bar after winning the NCG. He then denied having any contact with the agent, and played the '93 season.

No point in even trying to reason and use facts with idiots like this. This is probably the same Rantard idiot who called in to the Finebaum show recently claiming Alabama hasn't been flagged for holding a single time this season. Facts mean nothing to some of these idiots.