Started By
Message
re: If rematches are supposedly unfair...
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:51 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:51 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
If Okie St was undefeated you would be correct. I would still know deep down that Alabama was better than Okie St, and absolute thrashing of okie st in the NCG by LSu would prove it, but they would have deserved it for going undefeated. However, since Okie St lost to a terrible 6 and 6 team trying to pretend they deserve it is really saying hey im scared of playing a real team. At least if you were making a case for Stanford your motives wouldnt be so transparent.
Stanford? Wut?
At least make good points
Oregon thrashed Stanford at home
OSU are conference champs Big difference!!!!!
You bama fans need to start putting together good arguments
The problem here, is that you have the media passing you along as #2 by the "eye ball test"
Which is criminal to the rest of the nation
3
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:52 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
"eye ball test"
Yea that must be a quality loss to a 6 and 6 team. BEG LSU BEG!!!
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:54 pm to ApexTiger
The "eyeball" test is the best way to pick a champ.
Signed,
2006 Michigan
Signed,
2006 Michigan
Posted on 12/4/11 at 5:06 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
The problem here, is that you have the media passing you along as #2 by the "eye ball test"
I agree...my eyeballs think that Bama is a big smelly #2
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News