This Bama fan is against it because, unless we just blow you out which we won't, it will not be a legit title in my book. We didn't take care of business when it mattered and so I don't think we deserve another shot for all the marbles. Now if the PTB wanted to schedule a best of three type deal I'd be for that since then the winner could claim obvious superiority. Otherise you just set up everyone for a tie and you know what they say about those.
Of course my opinion and $1 might get you a coke so...

This post was edited on 11/20/11 at 12:39 pm

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by bmy

Nashville

Member since Oct 2007

48203 posts

Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:39 pm to Robin Masters

quote:
This Bama fan is against it because, unless we just blow you out which we won't, it will not be a legit title in my book. We didn't take care of business when it mattered and so I don't think we deserve another shot for all the marbles. Now if the PTB wanted to schedule a best of three type deal I'd be for that since then the winner could claim obvious superiority.

My thoughts exactly. I'd figure it to be a split title (in a close loss to Alabama on a neutral field). In an ideal world a best of three would take place.. game two on a neutral field, any potential game three in tiger stadium.

I think LSU would win it outright though

If we get past Arkansas and Georgia with no injuries at least.

This post was edited on 11/20/11 at 12:40 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by crimsonsaint

Member since Nov 2009

37280 posts

Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:56 pm to Robin Masters

quote:
This Bama fan is against it because, unless we just blow you out which we won't, it will not be a legit title in my book. We didn't take care of business when it mattered and so I don't think we deserve another shot for all the marbles.

If it had been a blowout I'd agree. But that game certainly could have had a different outcome. The best two teams in the country deserve a shot at the title.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by ReauxlTide222