quote:
t is no mean task to contain TR to less than 90 yards and worse make him lose yards on a not infrequent basis with one on one tackling. It is an opportunistic defense that doesn't mind giving up passing yards if it can pick up an INT or two.

You held him to less than 170 yards...

quote:
LSU has the better D than Bama.

You are dumb.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by bmy

Nashville

Member since Oct 2007

48203 posts

Posted on 11/8/11 at 11:19 am to Funky Tide 8

quote:

You held him to less than 170 yards...

It's pretty normal, when talking about RBs, to discuss how he impacted the running game. Trent was a nonfactor in the running game.. as was Eddie Lacy. He had a few really really nice runs, mostly in the first half. He got worn down.

Spencer Ware and Eddie Lacy both looked very very average. Trent Richardson and Ford both looked pretty damn good to me.

This post was edited on 11/8/11 at 11:21 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by CalTiger

California

Member since Jan 2004

3997 posts

Posted on 11/8/11 at 11:52 am to Funky Tide 8

quote:

You held him to less than 170 yards...

Surely you cannot be this dumb that you cannot comprehend that he is a fricking Heisman candidate RB who has already rushed for more than 1000 yards and multiple 100 yard games and the LSU D contained him and the entire Bama Running game. The yardage was with reference to rushing of course.

On the other hand Bama D gave up THRICE its rushing average to LSU.
LSU was also the first and maybe only team to break 100 rushing on Bama.

All your dismal attempts at name calling notwithstanding
LSU has proven to have the better D than Bama.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by brg0320

Member since May 2009

3295 posts

Posted on 11/26/11 at 12:38 pm to Funky Tide 8