Started By
Message
Posted on 7/9/11 at 10:41 pm to NIH
This thread is silly. Imagine that. The pigs saying theyre the best. State may have a couple of all sec lineman, but the best overall line????
Mingo and Montgomery are going to be QB nightmares this year. And NIH, you are a solid poster, but if you think dline depth is overrated, you obviously didn't watch LSU during 07. Our Dline depth played a huge role in a lit of games. To me, having a deep Dline of fast guys is one of the keys to SEC football
Mingo and Montgomery are going to be QB nightmares this year. And NIH, you are a solid poster, but if you think dline depth is overrated, you obviously didn't watch LSU during 07. Our Dline depth played a huge role in a lit of games. To me, having a deep Dline of fast guys is one of the keys to SEC football
Posted on 7/9/11 at 10:47 pm to NIH
LSU may be there, but I can't put them there. Too many questions. Is Montgomery the same? reports are good, but lets see that knee with contact. Mingo, will be amazing if he gets some weight on his frame. Brockers, just don't know how he'll do at 6'6 DT, at best a run-stopper, right now, but could blow up. Downs, heck, he hasn't stayed in games to know anything. Chauncey....meh. Freak Johnson...Stud, but a true Freshman. Maclin, promise, but young. Davenport moved to O-line. Edwards....Is he still on the team...LOL!..j/k. Logan,Allen, and Ego could step up, but not proven. Good group of kids, but its hard to project them as best in SEC, cause they are so young. Future looks awesome, but have to reserve judgement at this point.
Posted on 7/9/11 at 10:48 pm to NIH
USC
USC
USC
Everyone else still has something to prove or lacks depth.
USC
USC
Everyone else still has something to prove or lacks depth.
Posted on 7/10/11 at 7:31 pm to NIH
quote:
Depth on the DL is no where important as it's made out to be.
Yeah, tell that to your starters about the 4th quarter...
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)