Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Will auburn's recruits be allowed to transfer?

Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:57 pm
Posted by tigerfan63
cenla.
Member since Aug 2006
1690 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:57 pm
Most people think auburn is going to get hammered by the ncaa, but what happens to their recruiting class,will they have to sit out a year when they transfer?
Posted by bamafan425
Jackson's Hole
Member since Jan 2009
25637 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:58 pm to
We got dibs on Cyrus and Calloway.

Oh wait.
Posted by Michaeloar
Member since Nov 2010
532 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:01 pm to
nope, they don't lose a year of eligbility
Posted by McKeezy
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Aug 2010
3941 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:02 pm to
theres a 2000 page thread for people like u
Posted by tigerfan63
cenla.
Member since Aug 2006
1690 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:03 pm to
Would we even want robinson or reed.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:03 pm to
The rate at which the NCAA works, this will only affect future Barn players that are currently in the 8th grade.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:04 pm to
dibs on quan bray
Posted by Saurus
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2011
110 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:10 pm to
Nah, i think it'd be like USC where juniors and seniors (or how many classes the ban affects) to transfer without losing eligibility
Posted by Marines4Auburn
Auburn Alum in South Florida
Member since Sep 2009
14926 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

We got dibs on Cyrus and Calloway.

Oh wait.


Then you should call dibs on Craig Sanders, Ladarius Owens, Enrique Florence, Jonathan Rose and the other top athletes from the state that came to Auburn.
Posted by saintsman49
Member since Dec 2010
655 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:50 pm to
i was thunking the same thing as you were, saurus..... roll tide...
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13317 posts
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:26 pm to
The USC precedent would be used but the kids proven(if anything is ever proven)to have violated rules will be punished but it will depend on the NCAA how much.IIRC even Albert Means was allowed to transfer and play at some point.I don't know that whole story so i don't know exactly his involvement or what he did so i can't say what the players punishments would be based on him.The Bama or Auburn guys could tell more of what he did.
For instance if the Redd/Robinson investigation brought forth any proof and the players took something (I have doubts anything will ever come from it)then they'd definitely be punished.I just don't know if they would be permantly ineligible or if just for a while.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter