Started By
Message
re: 9 SEC teams in the Scout top 25 recruiting rankings
Posted on 2/2/11 at 6:55 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 2/2/11 at 6:55 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
What about ESPN? #3 on there.
ESPN = joke
Did you hear how they do rankings? Not on potential or character, etc; it's based on needs addressed.
Someone needs to tell ESPN this isn't the NFL draft.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 6:47 am to Koolaidkidiz
quote:
Did you hear how they do rankings? Not on potential or character, etc; it's based on needs addressed.
Someone needs to tell ESPN this isn't the NFL draft.
While I agree a point system is better, looking at needs addressed does make some sense. Not that this could happen, but a team could sign the top 3 QBs and the top 4 RBs and have a great class on paper but not all those kids can play.
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:13 am to Koolaidkidiz
Why wouldnt you rate a total class package on needs...just because you sign 9 RBs 5 stars doesnt mean you have a good class.
Rivals and Scout should both add a point tier for fulfilling class needs.
Rivals and Scout should both add a point tier for fulfilling class needs.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)