Started By
Message

re: 9 SEC teams in the Scout top 25 recruiting rankings

Posted on 2/2/11 at 6:55 pm to
Posted by Koolaidkidiz
Scratch Golfer
Member since Jan 2011
551 posts
Posted on 2/2/11 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

What about ESPN? #3 on there.


ESPN = joke
Did you hear how they do rankings? Not on potential or character, etc; it's based on needs addressed.

Someone needs to tell ESPN this isn't the NFL draft.
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Did you hear how they do rankings? Not on potential or character, etc; it's based on needs addressed.

Someone needs to tell ESPN this isn't the NFL draft.


While I agree a point system is better, looking at needs addressed does make some sense. Not that this could happen, but a team could sign the top 3 QBs and the top 4 RBs and have a great class on paper but not all those kids can play.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:13 am to
Why wouldnt you rate a total class package on needs...just because you sign 9 RBs 5 stars doesnt mean you have a good class.

Rivals and Scout should both add a point tier for fulfilling class needs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter