Started By
Message
re: Better back next year: Ridley or Ingram?
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:38 pm to Robot Santa
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:38 pm to Robot Santa
I don't really have a favorite pro team, so I just like to watch football at a really high level. I think if NE added Ingram, they would be ridiculously good, and better than they're now. They whip some arse w/o a true running threat. Wait until they add a guys like Ingram. Sheesh.
1
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:52 pm to gatordmb89
I wish NO would sign him - he would be beast for us.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:56 pm to Thracken13
I would have to take Ingram. Although I think it is 1 and 1A. I believe they will both be very productive backs in the NFL. I think we(Saints) will have a much better shot at Ridley because of where he will be picked. Ingram will more than likely IMO be a late 1st, 2nd rounder.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:07 pm to Nissanmaxima
probly true Nissan, and i tend more to believe your impression than believe mine would happen - but HS it would be awesome. Ingram, ivory and (insert name) would be a stout backfield
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:08 pm to Thracken13
I love Ridley but Ingram is a much better back.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:43 pm to ACL11190
quote:
Ware and Ford are the better talents.
HA!
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:48 pm to Funky Tide 8
This is a real question?
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:48 pm to SHELTONLSU
I have to agree, Ridley has been a great Tiger. He works hard, and gives everything he has to help the team. Looking at the two in a vacuum though Ingram is a more talented back.
With all that said it will depend more on things much outside of their control. Line/Scheme/supporting cast.
I hate comparing guys like this, it is almost never a fair evaluation to either.
With all that said it will depend more on things much outside of their control. Line/Scheme/supporting cast.
I hate comparing guys like this, it is almost never a fair evaluation to either.
This post was edited on 1/19/11 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:53 pm to pitbull20
quote:
I have to agree, Ridley has been a great Tiger.
He was great for you all and you should always be a fan of him. That being said, the two aren't on the same level. It would be like comparing Javy and Patrick Peterson. Both great, very popular players but one is obviously on another level than the other.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:56 pm to pitbull20
I think both will have good NFL career's. Ridley has better vision. The reason I think Ingram is better is because of speed. Not to mention Ridley has terrible lateral movement. Ingram accels in this category. If im a NFL Gm im not thinking to much about this one. Take Ingram. 
Posted on 1/19/11 at 4:16 pm to fightingsaint3
::sigh::
I wish the Jets could get him.
He's going to go the fricking Pats and make me cry.
I wish the Jets could get him.
He's going to go the fricking Pats and make me cry.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News