Here's the objectivity:

National Titles:

2-UF
2-LSU
1-BAMA
1-AUBURN
1-TENN
0-Rest

I know you're hating I put Bama over AU but both had national titles and both had undefeated SEC seasons. And going back to the original post Bama has more fans, better facilities (for now). I don't like it either, but the point is to be OBJECTIVE (remember)!

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Buck Sweep

Member since Oct 2010

853 posts

Posted on 1/17/11 at 11:28 pm to buckfama8

quote:
buckfama8

I know you're hating I actually read the first post, which said 2000-2010, and set out a few criteria which were, in fact, a bit subjective. Bama, even if you give them the 21 vacated wins is 5th in the SEC in wins during that time, has only one SECC, and has one BCS title. Auburn has 15 more wins, one more SECC, and a BCSC. You can only put bammer ahead for the stated time period if you simply ignore everything other than a great love for the crimson tide. TN hasn't won either and SEC title or BCS title during the stated years.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE

War Damn Eagle Dad!

Member since Oct 2010

105540 posts

Posted on 1/17/11 at 11:32 pm to buckfama8

quote:
I know you're hating I put Bama over AU but both had national titles and both had undefeated SEC seasons. And going back to the original post Bama has more fans, better facilities (for now). I don't like it either, but the point is to be OBJECTIVE (remember)!

Go to my previous post with actual stats and you will see Bucks reasoning and has nothing to do with rivalry just numbers. Wins, SEC Titles and NC's 2000-2010.

You keep going further back its obvious bama is clear top. I did 40 yrs back and bama had 5 NC, 13 SEC ranked above all SEC in wins, but 2000-2010 just wasn't very good till Saban arrived. Even adding vacated wins they are 5th in wins.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board