Started By
Message

re: Safety in the Sugar Bowl

Posted on 1/5/11 at 11:01 am to
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18174 posts
Posted on 1/5/11 at 11:01 am to
quote:

It would have been forward progress if the guy would have just went down but when he broke loose for the brief moment and ran a couple steps it was still considered a live play therefore the safety is legit IMO


The runner was clearly under the control of the tacklers and was PUSHED BACK into the endzone where he broke free (and we don't know if that was when the whistle was blown). If he had been breaking loose from the tackle in the field of play, and run into the endzone under his own power, forfeiting his forward progress, THEN it would have been a legitimate safety.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52921 posts
Posted on 1/5/11 at 11:08 am to
quote:

The runner was clearly under the control of the tacklers


bullshite
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter