Started By
Message

re: NCAA had no choice

Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:50 pm to
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9153 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:50 pm to
The Alabama situation with Ingram and Julio involved Alabama ruling them ineligible and the NCAA reinstating them after a two game suspension. In other words, they had to be ruled ineligible and reinstated by the NCAA prior to playing again. True, it was determined that the players received a benefit and that's not the case with Cam Newton, BUT Auburn never went through the reinstatement process until Nov 30, 2010 which was nearly a year after they were aware of eligibility issues with Cam Newton. Regardless of what Cam knew or didn't know and whether actual illegal benefits were received, that is a failure to follow NCAA protocol and that alone should be an NCAA penalty. Forget that there was no payment and this involved MSU and not Auburn, Cam Newton was damaged goods at that point and a solicitation violation had occurred which the NCAA just stated. Auburn failed to properly reinstate Newton prior to the 2010 football season. They waited after the regular season to declare him ineligible despite the issue being crystal clear well before the start of the season.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
35014 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Govt Tide


Cam was not ruled ineligible before the season though. He was just ruled ineligible by the NCAA on monday. Even in the bama case, Bama had to apply for reinstatement, the NCAA doesn't just reinstate people. At no point until this monday, had the NCAA advised AU to rule Cam ineligible because up until then, nothing substantial had been found.
This post was edited on 12/2/10 at 3:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter