Started By
Message

re: Auburn's BCS championship forever tainted?

Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:30 am to
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:30 am to
Is Southern Cal's 2004 ? Really,do many people give it much thought ?
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
24268 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:34 am to
true but Reggie Bush isnt viewed to have taken money from the school just an agent which doesnt offer a competitive adv to USC. WRongly or correctly Auburn is being viewed as having payed for him which hasnt been proven or even suggested as far as I know. If this just turns out he was ineligible then to me it isnt like it offered a competitive adv and is really no big deal. Had Bama lost games when Julio and Ingram or Marcell had to sit out over the last couple of yrs then I might feel differently.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89790 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Is Southern Cal's 2004 ? Really,do many people give it much thought ?


Worse, the whole era is tainted. Southern Cal clearly doesn't care about that. Hiring Kiffin, they were actually "All In", first. Auburn is just doing it on a grand scale. And it won't take 6 years for this to happen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter