
Ace Midnight
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | Between sanity and madness |
| Biography: | Been there, done that, became jaded, am cynical |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Adventurer |
| Number of Posts: | 96314 |
| Registered on: | 12/16/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: What’s your age? Do you collect Social Security?
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 3:56 pm to ErectileReptile
quote:
What’s your age? Do you collect Social Security?
Under 60.
No.
re: Was 2024 Pointless?
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 2:16 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Was 2024 Pointless?
Defense wins championships.
re: Data leak exposes Andrew Tate’s online empire.
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 2:14 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Penetrating the Elite
:pimp:
Not so subtle take on "Eat the Rich", eh?
re: What is your funniest movie all time?
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 2:12 pm to Muahahaha
quote:
There are several for me, but if I had to pick one, it’s Caddyshack
Caddyshack and Ghostbusters for that same era are probably #1 and #1a for me and that might be overall.
For classic films, it's hard to beat the Marx Brothers - really their masterpiece, for me, is A Night at the Opera. But, Duck Soup has some of their best bits as well (and many folks rank that one higher)
Also, Some Like it Hot and The Apartment (both with Jack Lemmon).
Any list should also include Blazing Saddles, It Happened One Night, The Philadelphia Story, Bringing up Baby and His Girl Friday.
re: Question for the Veterans
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 1:37 pm to Lutcher Lad
quote:
Is there anything more despicable than stolen valor?
Yes. Most violent crimes, rape, murder, child abuse, etc.
For just boorish behavior? It's way up there on the despicable scale.
re: I Didn't Even Know Black Folk Were Mad @Texas Roadhouse, But Hard to Argue w/this Response
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 12:13 pm to KCT
We had a fantastic steak last time.
re: Bought My First Tube Amp This Week!
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 9:28 am to wareaglepete
quote:
I don't know how they are on guitar, but to get a decent tone on bass, it is a chore. I've tried Darkglass, Line 6, Headrush and I just don't like it.
I'm not being a contrarian and I don't play a lot of bass, but how many bass tones are there? I get that a cover act might need a little more equipment to cover an unusual mix of genres or whatever.
Modelling for guitar is mainly to cut down on equipment needs (IMHO), not to find a "new" or interesting tone. It is a "good enough" solution for just bashing about in the practice space (or even for some recording needs). Forgive me if I'm being naive, but shouldn't a bass player lock into what he's bringing and have a (relative to a guitar player with gear acquisition syndrome) relatively tight equipment mix?
I'm open to being educated but I've always assumed that bass modelling never took off because there's little demand for it.
re: White hippie nose ring next to me at the bar was reading a "Handmaid's Tale"
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/30/26 at 7:58 pm to j1897
PIIHB
re: Today on “Does the OT Think This Chick is Obese?”… (NSFW)
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/29/26 at 7:57 pm to finchmeister08

re: Bought My First Tube Amp This Week!
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/29/26 at 7:56 pm to Jef75
quote:
tube powered amps respond a certain way when cranked, move air in the cabinet differently than a digital, precisely regulated signal.
There's something distinct in the sound. That's what's being 'modeled' digitally.
I don't disagree with any of this.
quote:
If 'close enough' or good enough works for you, excellent.
quote:
It's not snobbery to dig deeper into sound and playability dynamics.
:lol:
quote:
Strange thing to be in opposition of.
Spend your money the way you want, baw. #Seriously
re: Bought My First Tube Amp This Week!
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/29/26 at 11:05 am to Jef75
quote:
I'm sure modeling is getting better
Obviously, modelling provides about a 90% solution in 2026 - particularly in a bang for buck standpoint, it is a no brainer.
quote:
but tubes have character that I can't see reproducing digitally.
What tubes? What sort of sound? The problem with tube purists is that they've largely convinced themselves - there is both a somatic component AND a placebo effect going on at the same time.
And even then, you can spend out the wazoo for a specific tube sound and you've got that single sound. A good modelling setup for about half the price can provide dozens if not hundreds of "good enough sounds". So, it just depends on how you want to spend your money.
As a reminder, some of these wealthy amateurs insist on paying $3500 to $5k (or more) on a single guitar when they could have an entire collection of decent guitars that might scratch a lot of itches.
Tryhardism is expensive (not saying that's what you did, OP, but just talking about tube purists in general).
re: Activision Re-releasing 39 titles for the Atari
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/29/26 at 7:40 am to boxcarbarney
Memberberries
re: Fossil fuels question - scientific not political
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/29/26 at 7:33 am to Lou
quote:
an innocuous question

re: Fossil fuels question - scientific not political
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 1:24 pm to Lou
quote:
So - why are they called "fossil" fuels?
Fossilized remains of ancient (pre-dinosaur) marine organisms.
Please tell me you didn't think the only "fossils" were dinosaurs
quote:
They have found fossils at 25,000 feet only.

re: Which US president would you pick in a street/bar fight?
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 7:35 am to ClientNumber9
I mean, it's prime Teddy Roosevelt and it isn't particularly close. I will say that Abe Lincoln would surprise some baws in here. Andy Jackson and George Washington would be solid picks.
Those would be my top 4.
Those would be my top 4.
re: I didn’t know that Joe Scarborough was a total idiot. I thought he was just dumb, but …
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 7:30 am to GatorOnAnIsland
The only reason to be anti-Voter ID/election security is because you are pro-fraud.
#Period
#Period
re: Longtime Stars and Stripes leaders suing Hegseth, Pentagon to challenge their firings
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 7:21 am to cajunangelle
Stars and Stripes, as well as AFR/AFTV were captured and compromised a long, long time ago. Really, under Clinton.
The left never sleeps.
The left never sleeps.
re: Can you name the oldest fictional sitcom husband/wife in which both actors are still alive
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 7:18 am to Keys Open Doors
quote:
Has to be William Daniels (Mr. Feeney) and Bonnie Bartlett on St. Elsewhere.
They played a couple quite a few times. Including her guesting as Mrs. Feeny.
That could qualify for the sitcom title although they were not a lead couple (and she was not a regular, IIRC). I mean, we should just award it to them, anyway. They were married 75 years ago. They won Emmys for St. Elsewhere on the same night.
#Crownthem
re: Can you name the oldest fictional sitcom husband/wife in which both actors are still alive
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 7:09 am to PowerTool
quote:
Bert and Ernie?
Ernie (Jim Henson) has been gone.
As far as the OP, I was going to guess Linden/Barrie from Barney Miller without looking it up.
If MTM had lived to her birthday this year (December), she and Dick Van Dyke would be a combined 191 years old. But she's been gone.
I think Linden and Barrie's combined 190 years would be tough to beat in any era.
re: Where Did You First Hear There are More Than Two Sexes?
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/28/26 at 6:37 am to Missouri Waltz
Well, there are only two.
There is definitive proof. If you are a man, there is a hormonal program and a series of surgical procedures to attempt to have you appear more "like" a woman. Conversely, there is a similar protocol if you are a woman who wants to appear more "like" a man.
There is no protocol to transition to any other "gender". Certainly no hormones. And if we're talking "dragonkin" or things like that, those are just extreme body modifications (as are, frankly, those surgeries mentioned above).
But there are no hormones or primary/secondary sexual characteristics of anything other than men or women because those other things are made up.
#Facts
There is definitive proof. If you are a man, there is a hormonal program and a series of surgical procedures to attempt to have you appear more "like" a woman. Conversely, there is a similar protocol if you are a woman who wants to appear more "like" a man.
There is no protocol to transition to any other "gender". Certainly no hormones. And if we're talking "dragonkin" or things like that, those are just extreme body modifications (as are, frankly, those surgeries mentioned above).
But there are no hormones or primary/secondary sexual characteristics of anything other than men or women because those other things are made up.
#Facts
re: What is your favorite tree?
Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/27/26 at 4:01 pm to crap4brain
Live oak
Popular
0











