Favorite team:
Location:Between sanity and madness
Biography:Been there, done that, became jaded, am cynical
Interests:
Occupation:Adventurer
Number of Posts:96314
Registered on:12/16/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

What’s your age? Do you collect Social Security?


Under 60.

No.

re: Was 2024 Pointless?

Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Was 2024 Pointless?



Defense wins championships.
quote:

Penetrating the Elite


:pimp:

Not so subtle take on "Eat the Rich", eh?
quote:

There are several for me, but if I had to pick one, it’s Caddyshack


Caddyshack and Ghostbusters for that same era are probably #1 and #1a for me and that might be overall.

For classic films, it's hard to beat the Marx Brothers - really their masterpiece, for me, is A Night at the Opera. But, Duck Soup has some of their best bits as well (and many folks rank that one higher)

Also, Some Like it Hot and The Apartment (both with Jack Lemmon).

Any list should also include Blazing Saddles, It Happened One Night, The Philadelphia Story, Bringing up Baby and His Girl Friday.

re: Question for the Veterans

Posted by Ace Midnight on 8/31/26 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Is there anything more despicable than stolen valor?


Yes. Most violent crimes, rape, murder, child abuse, etc.

For just boorish behavior? It's way up there on the despicable scale.
quote:

I don't know how they are on guitar, but to get a decent tone on bass, it is a chore. I've tried Darkglass, Line 6, Headrush and I just don't like it.


I'm not being a contrarian and I don't play a lot of bass, but how many bass tones are there? I get that a cover act might need a little more equipment to cover an unusual mix of genres or whatever.

Modelling for guitar is mainly to cut down on equipment needs (IMHO), not to find a "new" or interesting tone. It is a "good enough" solution for just bashing about in the practice space (or even for some recording needs). Forgive me if I'm being naive, but shouldn't a bass player lock into what he's bringing and have a (relative to a guitar player with gear acquisition syndrome) relatively tight equipment mix?

I'm open to being educated but I've always assumed that bass modelling never took off because there's little demand for it.
quote:

tube powered amps respond a certain way when cranked, move air in the cabinet differently than a digital, precisely regulated signal.

There's something distinct in the sound. That's what's being 'modeled' digitally.


I don't disagree with any of this.

quote:

If 'close enough' or good enough works for you, excellent.


quote:

It's not snobbery to dig deeper into sound and playability dynamics.


:lol:

quote:

Strange thing to be in opposition of.


Spend your money the way you want, baw. #Seriously
quote:

I'm sure modeling is getting better


Obviously, modelling provides about a 90% solution in 2026 - particularly in a bang for buck standpoint, it is a no brainer.

quote:

but tubes have character that I can't see reproducing digitally.


What tubes? What sort of sound? The problem with tube purists is that they've largely convinced themselves - there is both a somatic component AND a placebo effect going on at the same time.

And even then, you can spend out the wazoo for a specific tube sound and you've got that single sound. A good modelling setup for about half the price can provide dozens if not hundreds of "good enough sounds". So, it just depends on how you want to spend your money.

As a reminder, some of these wealthy amateurs insist on paying $3500 to $5k (or more) on a single guitar when they could have an entire collection of decent guitars that might scratch a lot of itches.

Tryhardism is expensive (not saying that's what you did, OP, but just talking about tube purists in general).
quote:

So - why are they called "fossil" fuels?


Fossilized remains of ancient (pre-dinosaur) marine organisms.

Please tell me you didn't think the only "fossils" were dinosaurs

quote:

They have found fossils at 25,000 feet only.


I mean, it's prime Teddy Roosevelt and it isn't particularly close. I will say that Abe Lincoln would surprise some baws in here. Andy Jackson and George Washington would be solid picks.

Those would be my top 4.
The only reason to be anti-Voter ID/election security is because you are pro-fraud.

#Period
Stars and Stripes, as well as AFR/AFTV were captured and compromised a long, long time ago. Really, under Clinton.

The left never sleeps.
quote:

Has to be William Daniels (Mr. Feeney) and Bonnie Bartlett on St. Elsewhere.


They played a couple quite a few times. Including her guesting as Mrs. Feeny.

That could qualify for the sitcom title although they were not a lead couple (and she was not a regular, IIRC). I mean, we should just award it to them, anyway. They were married 75 years ago. They won Emmys for St. Elsewhere on the same night.

#Crownthem
quote:

Bert and Ernie?


Ernie (Jim Henson) has been gone.

As far as the OP, I was going to guess Linden/Barrie from Barney Miller without looking it up.

If MTM had lived to her birthday this year (December), she and Dick Van Dyke would be a combined 191 years old. But she's been gone.

I think Linden and Barrie's combined 190 years would be tough to beat in any era.
Well, there are only two.

There is definitive proof. If you are a man, there is a hormonal program and a series of surgical procedures to attempt to have you appear more "like" a woman. Conversely, there is a similar protocol if you are a woman who wants to appear more "like" a man.

There is no protocol to transition to any other "gender". Certainly no hormones. And if we're talking "dragonkin" or things like that, those are just extreme body modifications (as are, frankly, those surgeries mentioned above).

But there are no hormones or primary/secondary sexual characteristics of anything other than men or women because those other things are made up.

#Facts