Started By
Message
re: CAMGATE - What YOU need to know
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:45 pm to NBamaAlum
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:45 pm to NBamaAlum
Does anyone know the answer to this question:
If FATHER shops STUDENT to school A (without STUDENT's knowledge), does this make STUDENT ineligible at any school or just ineligible at school A?
If ineligible only at shopped school(s), then kids will pick one school to sign with, but shop everywhere else for $$$ as there is no penalty for doing so.
If FATHER shops STUDENT to school A (without STUDENT's knowledge), does this make STUDENT ineligible at any school or just ineligible at school A?
If ineligible only at shopped school(s), then kids will pick one school to sign with, but shop everywhere else for $$$ as there is no penalty for doing so.
3
Posted on 11/14/10 at 4:06 pm to pensacola
LOL,do you really think Cam didn't know ? Really ?
Posted on 11/14/10 at 4:32 pm to pensacola
quote:
If FATHER shops STUDENT to school A (without STUDENT's knowledge), does this make STUDENT ineligible at any school or just ineligible at school A?
All schools. His father became his agent
Posted on 11/15/10 at 10:12 am to pensacola
quote:
If FATHER shops STUDENT to school A (without STUDENT's knowledge), does this make STUDENT ineligible at any school or just ineligible at school A?
See? That's the problem with Auburn's response. If they have clean hands (*hint, they don't and the AD and football coaches know it), they declare him ineligible and apply for reinstatement based on the "fact" that Auburn and Cam are innocent and Rogers, Cecil and MSU are guilty.
That's impossible to do since the evidence doesn't support it. "All in", until the trumpet blows and and the walls come down.
Slive, Jacobs and Chizik will all be caught in the backwash of this.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News