Started By
Message
re: So did the ref help Auburn beat Arkansas?
Posted on 10/17/10 at 3:35 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 10/17/10 at 3:35 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Ummm...dude, the PI call was legit. You're DB hooked his arm around the Arky Receiver's waist right in front of the official. That is almost automatic PI. It happened and was called consistently in several games today alone.
The only questionable call I saw for Arky was the spot on one of their plays, but it was still close and not much of an extra cushion.
Auburn, on the other hand, got tons of calls and tons of no calls including the play in question for the PI where your POS Fairly roughed Mallet and hurt him. The ball was gone and Fairley still drove Mallet to the ground after the fact in front of the main official with no call whatsoever.
In the end, the Refs had an extreme effect on the game that greatly and unfairly benefited Auburn.
The only questionable call I saw for Arky was the spot on one of their plays, but it was still close and not much of an extra cushion.
Auburn, on the other hand, got tons of calls and tons of no calls including the play in question for the PI where your POS Fairly roughed Mallet and hurt him. The ball was gone and Fairley still drove Mallet to the ground after the fact in front of the main official with no call whatsoever.
In the end, the Refs had an extreme effect on the game that greatly and unfairly benefited Auburn.
1
Posted on 10/17/10 at 9:02 am to LSUMafia
quote:
Ummm...dude, the PI call was legit. You're DB hooked his arm around the Arky Receiver's waist right in front of the official. That is almost automatic PI. It happened and was called consistently in several games today alone.
The only questionable call I saw for Arky was the spot on one of their plays, but it was still close and not much of an extra cushion.
The PI in the endzone is normally a no call. Could it be called a PI? Yep, his hand was on his back but no more so than on any other pass play that a db plays the receiver close. This lead to a touchdown instead a fieldgoal.
The spot was about a foot to 18" off is what it looked like to me. Looking at the replay, not sure how they missed the spot so bad.
As for the Fannin touchdown, I am shocked that made it through replay. And I'm not sure how the fumble got called a fumble on the field. I have complained about this same scenerio several times when they stop a play that should have been a fumble, it just so happened to work in our favor since no camera angle was very good.
After seeing the last few games across the SEC, the officiating sucks as bad as last year but the replay booth is really bad. They piss away a lot of time and still seem to get a lot of calls wrong.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News