This is gonna be a good one. Physical D vs. Physical back.

Auburn has a stellar Rush D and Bamas is prob better so they`ll probably crush him. However, I have no idea how their o-line is now. They were pretty beat up when they played us.

Hate to say it but, Ridley>Lattimore

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by UpstateCock2007

Columbia, SC

Member since Mar 2009

7719 posts

Posted on 10/5/10 at 6:33 am to wardamnamerica

Our O-Line was without two starters v Auburn, but both should be back this weekend. With that said, I still think Lattimore has somewhere between 75-100 yards on 20 carries or fewer. We are going to have to pass the ball to have a chance to win.

GAMErebelCOCK... eff the Giants.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Alahunter

Member since Jan 2008

90739 posts

Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:07 am to wardamnamerica

quote:
Auburn has a stellar Rush D and Bamas is prob better

Bama's is good, but so far, Auburn's has been better.

Auburn 12th in the nation in rush defense
Alabama 19th in the nation in rush defense

Only Lsu is in the top 20 with both and they're at 6th.

South Carolina is ranked 41st in rush defense, so I'm liking Bama's chances of controlling the clock and keeping Lattimore on the bench alot. Thus making them have to pass more. I don't think he'll get 100 on us Saturday. If I had to guess a team that would break the streak of a 100 yd rusher, at this point, I'd say Lsu and if not them, then Auburn.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by FootballNostradamus

Member since Nov 2009

20509 posts

Posted on 10/5/10 at 10:44 am to wardamnamerica

quote:
Hate to say it but, Ridley>Lattimore

Is this even a question? Give Ridley a decent passing game and he'd be in the conversation with Ingram; he's that good. It's a shame his play has been overshadowed by the complete ineptness of the rest of the offense.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board