Started By
Message

New stiffarmtrophy.com projections have Suh...
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:22 pm
...moving into second place behind Ingram with Gerhart in a dead heat with Suh for the second spot. If the Heisman people say they determine the finalists based on a natural gap in the voting, can somebody explain why Tim Tebow is a finalist and why we don't just have four players in New York?
LINK
LINK
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:24 pm to bigpapamac
Another undeserving winner. Par for the course
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:25 pm to bigpapamac
No way in hell Suh should win the Heisman.
10 sacks. Four of those in one game.
The Heisman is a joke.
10 sacks. Four of those in one game.
The Heisman is a joke.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:27 pm to bigpapamac
there's a reason why Suh has the most 1st place votes and Ingram has the most 2nd
Posted on 12/11/09 at 6:00 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
Another undeserving winner. Par for the course
Posted on 12/11/09 at 6:00 pm to deaux68
quote:
No way in hell Suh should win the Heisman.

Posted on 12/11/09 at 6:12 pm to deaux68
quote:
No way in hell Suh should win the Heisman.
Slap yo'self.
This post was edited on 12/11/09 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 12/11/09 at 6:15 pm to deaux68
quote:
10 sacks. Four of those in one game.
Do you realize what position he's playing?
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:10 pm to Golfer
John Copeland and Eric Curry both had 10 sacks playing DL for Alabama in '92.
This post was edited on 12/11/09 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:12 pm to NATidefan
quote:And?
John Copeland and Eric Curry both had 10 sacks playing DL for Alabama in '92.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:15 pm to bigpapamac
We all want to see Teboy cry just one more time.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:17 pm to Roaad
I just don't find it overly impressive when you are playing in a pass happy conference and get four of your 10 sacks in one game. Don't get me wrong, I think he is good, but I don't think he is any more deserving than Ingram or Gerhart is. I think they are all pretty even.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:17 pm to Roaad
I would rather lose to Suh because Gerhart is not better than Ingram.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:21 pm to NATidefan
I think that's my problem with everyone dissing Ingram, sure he isn't miles ahead of Suh or Gerhart, but those guys aren't miles ahead of Ingram either.
I think the polls show exactly that.
Ingram 44% chance of winning
Suh 40% chance of winning
Gerhart 40% chance of winning
It's very even, and with the way the Heisman is, a guy on a better team has a better chance of winning. And I think Ingram deserves it as much as the other two.
I think the polls show exactly that.
Ingram 44% chance of winning
Suh 40% chance of winning
Gerhart 40% chance of winning
It's very even, and with the way the Heisman is, a guy on a better team has a better chance of winning. And I think Ingram deserves it as much as the other two.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:56 pm to NATidefan
I've never understood why there are 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place votes.
Wouldn't it make more sense that the player who most people think is the #1 player in the country to win the Heisman???
why do you get bonus points for having more second place votes than third place votes?
Wouldn't it make more sense that the player who most people think is the #1 player in the country to win the Heisman???
why do you get bonus points for having more second place votes than third place votes?
Posted on 12/11/09 at 8:57 pm to hashtag
Suh has 12 sacks, not 10 (per ESPN)
Completely agree.
quote:
The Heisman is a joke.
Completely agree.
This post was edited on 12/11/09 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 12/11/09 at 9:02 pm to bmy
John Henderson had 13 sacks as a DT in 2000, and he was never mentioned for the Heisman.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 9:02 pm to Roaad
quote:they were never in the running for the trophy and they were part of one of the best defenses ever.....
John Copeland and Eric Curry both had 10 sacks playing DL for Alabama in '92.
And?
Posted on 12/11/09 at 9:03 pm to bigpapamac
That boy named Suh is a good one.
Latest Ole Miss News
Popular
Back to top

5






