Started By
Message

Do Alabama fans think Peterson made the interception?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:15 am
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:15 am
Just curious how Bama fans feel about the call.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:16 am to FC Barcelona
i do...looked like he had both feet in...
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:16 am to FC Barcelona
That would have been an INT in the NFL.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:16 am to FC Barcelona
Yes. We also think that it wouldn't have mattered because LSU's offense was being run by Jarrett Lee without Charles Scott, and managed only 9 yards total in the 4th quarter.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:17 am to FC Barcelona
most do - there will be the few that will argue to the death that it was the right call though
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:17 am to TT9
yes and we have all conceded that, but it did not lose the game for them no more than the GA call lost it for GA.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:17 am to superman
Probably right! But LSU should have been given the chance none the less.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:18 am to superman
quote:that's what made it so disheartening though
Yes. We also think that it wouldn't have mattered because LSU's offense was being run by Jarrett Lee without Charles Scott, and managed only 9 yards total in the 4th quarter.
it tough our chance to make a comeback away - regardless of how we inept we had been on offense in the 4th
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:18 am to superman
Yes, it was obvious.
This is the sec, the officials are bound to bend you over at some point. This week was yours.
Ours could be next. just part of it until we get that cock sucker slive(just sounds slimy) out.
This is the sec, the officials are bound to bend you over at some point. This week was yours.
Ours could be next. just part of it until we get that cock sucker slive(just sounds slimy) out.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:18 am to tuck
Yea, it didn't decide the game but I'd much rather have the ball with 6 min down by 6 than 3 min down by 9...
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:19 am to 1965 2 plus 2
quote:
Probably right! But LSU should have been given the chance none the less.
that's my issue. Alabama fans keep saying it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter.....
Maybe so, but rather than getting that CHANCE, the refs take it away from them. That is the main issue I have with it.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:19 am to 1965 2 plus 2
Would have liked to see us get the chance down 6 with 6 minutes to go. I think this Ridley kid is going to tear it up if he gets a chance. Scott being out would have hurt, but 6 points down with 6 minutes gives you the possibility of running a normal offense. 9 points down with 3 minutes to go does not.
Ah well, can't change shite now.
Ah well, can't change shite now.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:19 am to superman
quote:
Yes. We also think that it wouldn't have mattered because LSU's offense was being run by Jarrett Lee without Charles Scott, and managed only 9 yards total in the 4th quarter.
I also think Bama could have stuck it in the endzone again instead of taking a knee with about 2 minutes left to go.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:20 am to superman
quote:
We also think that it wouldn't have mattered because LSU's offense was being run by Jarrett Lee without Charles Scott, and managed only 9 yards total in the 4th quarter.
Yes, but it should be allowed to be played out - you never know what might happen. THis way, if LSU still didn't score, your defense would get all the credit instead of the corrupt officiating.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:20 am to FC Barcelona
I think he made it yes.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:22 am to superman
quote:
Yes. We also think that it wouldn't have mattered because LSU's offense was being run by Jarrett Lee without Charles Scott, and managed only 9 yards total in the 4th quarter.
+10000000000
To all those idiots that have been crying for Lee to play all season, I hope you now realize that he isn't even good enough to start for Southeastern LA.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:22 am to FC Barcelona
I think the bottom line is that the wrong call was made on the FIELD, because the play happened so quickly. When the replay officials sat down and looked at the replays, there was nothing there that they could use to overturn the call, because ALL of the camera angles sucked and left at least a little doubt as to whether or not he had possession with a foot in bounds.
I maintain that if the play had been called an INT on the field, it would have been upheld.
I maintain that if the play had been called an INT on the field, it would have been upheld.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top

16





