Started By
Message
re: "Vacated" wins do not equate to losses...
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:05 am to BamaJD88
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:05 am to BamaJD88
Shula was 6-7 in 2007. I think most, if not all, of those 6 wins may be vacated. I say that because I think that's about the time that some of the football players got books.
4
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:11 am to BamaJD88
Vacating these wins makes no sense. The university had no idea that the players had obtained these textbooks improperly until mid-season 2007. They suspended the players right away when they found out.
I understand the premise for the forfeiture of games under Stallings because from what I had heard the university did not really perform due dilligence on the Antonio Langham issue before the 1993 season.
ETA: Although, I don't personally count the forfeit in 1993 as a win for State. We lost on the field where it really matters. We had the same thing happen to us at State in 1976 and 1977.
I understand the premise for the forfeiture of games under Stallings because from what I had heard the university did not really perform due dilligence on the Antonio Langham issue before the 1993 season.
ETA: Although, I don't personally count the forfeit in 1993 as a win for State. We lost on the field where it really matters. We had the same thing happen to us at State in 1976 and 1977.
This post was edited on 6/11/09 at 10:14 am
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:17 am to BamaJD88
quote:
Shula was 6-7 in 2007.
What??????????
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:22 am to BamaJD88
quote:
Shula was 6-7 in 2007.
Are you sure you're a Bama fan?
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:24 am to BamaJD88
quote:
Shula was 6-7 in 2007.
What team was he coaching to this record in 2007?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News