Started By
Message

re: "Vacated" wins do not equate to losses...

Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:44 am to
Posted by BamaJD88
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Jan 2007
718 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:44 am to
quote:

quote:
A "vacated" win is not a "forfeited" game.

Vacate does not mean forfeit. The teams that lost to Alabama will still have a loss, but Alabama will not count the wins as a win. It will be treated, for purposes of Alabama's record, as if no game were played at all. In other words, assuming 5 of the 7 wins in 2007 are vacated, then Alabama's record will be 2-6 as far as the NCAA is concerned.



This is the dumbest fricking thing I've ever seen..


Only loser schools count games that they lost on the field and were later "forfeited" as wins anyway.
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Only loser schools get in the situation where games they won on the field and were later "forfeited" anyway.


fixed it for you.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Only loser schools count games that they lost on the field and were later "forfeited" as wins anyway.



Who is counting them? Looks like Bama now has the NCAA in its back pocket
Posted by Champs
Geaux Tigers
Member since Feb 2008
11754 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:50 am to
do you have to give the Tshirts back
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter