Started By
Message
re: "Vacated" wins do not equate to losses...
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:42 am to BamaJD88
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:42 am to BamaJD88
quote:
A "vacated" win is not a "forfeited" game.
Vacate does not mean forfeit. The teams that lost to Alabama will still have a loss, but Alabama will not count the wins as a win. It will be treated, for purposes of Alabama's record, as if no game were played at all. In other words, assuming 5 of the 7 wins in 2007 are vacated, then Alabama's record will be 2-6 as far as the NCAA is concerned.
This is the dumbest fricking thing I've ever seen..
1
Posted on 6/11/09 at 9:44 am to sugatowng
quote:
quote:
A "vacated" win is not a "forfeited" game.
Vacate does not mean forfeit. The teams that lost to Alabama will still have a loss, but Alabama will not count the wins as a win. It will be treated, for purposes of Alabama's record, as if no game were played at all. In other words, assuming 5 of the 7 wins in 2007 are vacated, then Alabama's record will be 2-6 as far as the NCAA is concerned.
This is the dumbest fricking thing I've ever seen..
Only loser schools count games that they lost on the field and were later "forfeited" as wins anyway.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News