Started By
Message
re: SEC vs. PAC (Wack) 10
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:41 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:41 pm to LSUTANGERINE
He did not say he was open to playoffs. To me, it said I'm not changing jack, but please stop picking on us for being chickens%^t about it. Did not sound open to change. Oh, and the Rose Bowl is great the way it is- with Big 10 / Pac 10 connections.
You make false claims and question my response? I freely admit I'll be irrational about the PAC-10 until they stop holding the plus 1 hostage. You select certain quotes and translate them through your rose colored glasses.
Didnt care to discuss your fellow PAC 10 brothren's comments?
You make false claims and question my response? I freely admit I'll be irrational about the PAC-10 until they stop holding the plus 1 hostage. You select certain quotes and translate them through your rose colored glasses.
Didnt care to discuss your fellow PAC 10 brothren's comments?
1
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:48 pm to junior
quote:
He did not say he was open to playoffs. To me, it said I'm not changing jack, but please stop picking on us for being chickens%^t about it. Did not sound open to change. Oh, and the Rose Bowl is great the way it is- with Big 10 / Pac 10 connections.
What part of Yes in his response did you not get? He admitted he is opn to it and stated although that does not mean there will or WILL NOT be change, he is open.
That's okay. I did not expect you to man up and be true to your word anyway.
This post was edited on 4/24/09 at 2:54 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News