Started By
Message
re: SEC vs. PAC (Wack) 10
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:13 pm to junior
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:13 pm to junior
quote:
ME: Is that why the new PAC-10 commish just said he is open to playoffs?
You: Link please. If true, I'll delete my post and resume reasonable discussion.
So you are willing to discuss the possibility of a playoff and willing to look at potential changes?
Yes, in the sense that I've been brought in to come with a new and fresh perspective in everything. There's been no issue that I've been told, 'This one you can't touch,' or, 'This isn't up for discussion.' . . . I don't want my answer to be interpreted as signaling there will be a change or won't be a change to the Pac-10's position on this. But I think it's fair to say that the reason someone like myself has been chosen is that people want a fresh look at all these things.
quote:
My irrational PAC 10 bashing continues.
That's okay you can go back on your word. I did not expect you to man up.
At least you admit your discussions are irrational and unreasonable.
1
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:41 pm to LSUTANGERINE
He did not say he was open to playoffs. To me, it said I'm not changing jack, but please stop picking on us for being chickens%^t about it. Did not sound open to change. Oh, and the Rose Bowl is great the way it is- with Big 10 / Pac 10 connections.
You make false claims and question my response? I freely admit I'll be irrational about the PAC-10 until they stop holding the plus 1 hostage. You select certain quotes and translate them through your rose colored glasses.
Didnt care to discuss your fellow PAC 10 brothren's comments?
You make false claims and question my response? I freely admit I'll be irrational about the PAC-10 until they stop holding the plus 1 hostage. You select certain quotes and translate them through your rose colored glasses.
Didnt care to discuss your fellow PAC 10 brothren's comments?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News