Who Does Sankey Add After Clemson End Ole Miss' Program?

It's the wild west, Dabos whiney arse just can't adjust. He is going to explode with the NCAa either does or does not do anything and a court over rules them.

Clemson is dead.

Every school worth a shite is tampering.
Ole Miss has receipts of multiple schools tampering with our players.
NCAA is very close to getting their shite pushed in with selective enforcement.

Lt Colombo is still a faqqot.

This is good shite. Keep it coming.

quote:

---

NFLSU

---

Imagine having this guys life.
Bet his wife (if he even has one) outweighs most players on LSU’s team.
Just sits around in his shanty in some Louisiana shite hole posting on an anonymous message board collecting mailbox money.

quote:

---

Fresno St just did

---

The ncaa back is against the wall. This is their perfect " we are still in control " moment. Goodbye Pete

I fully understand that my post is far too serious for this board, but there's not much the NCAA can do about tampering at the moment.

From an anti-trust perspective, the NCAA rules against tampering look like the NCAA is punishing schools for providing players with information about their current value on the open market. It isn't hard to make an argument that anti-tampering rules are an unreasonable restriction on trade. The Alston decision held that even though the NCAA has an interest in enforcing rules that provide for fair and balanced competition, that interest does not outweigh the state's interest in enforcing anti-trust regulations.

Additionally, the NCAA is currently under an injunction not to enforce their rules that say players can't negotiate NIL agreements until after they have signed with a school. The reasoning is similar to the first point -- players have a right to know what they are worth before they sign away their ability to negotiate.

So while it's obvious that a coach texting a player saying "if you enter the portal and transfer to our school, we'll pay you more than you are currently making." is a violation of current NCAA rules, it is much less clear whether or not the NCAA will actually enforce that rule because it is going to be the subject of a lawsuit that the NCAA probably will not win.

Everyone is doing it. Everyone knows everyone is doing it. And the NCAA likely can't do anything about it because they'll just lose in court again.

Also, no one should be surprised when a player sues the NCAA this spring to transfer and be immediately eligible. The "only one transfer portal" rule won't hold up either for similar reasons.

quote:

---

From an anti-trust perspective, the NCAA rules against tampering look like the NCAA is punishing schools for providing players with information about their current value on the open market. It isn't hard to make an argument that anti-tampering rules are an unreasonable restriction on trade. The Alston decision held that even though the NCAA has an interest in enforcing rules that provide for fair and balanced competition, that interest does not outweigh the state's interest in enforcing anti-trust regulations.

---

This gibberish tells me the Ole miss fan base is down to a hope and a prayer.

quote:

---

Lt Colombo is still a faqqot.

---

What did I ever do to you?

Agreed everyone is tampering, but the issue is the NCAA is going to look for a scapegoat to sacrifice, and they aren't going to go after a big money brand like Bama or LSU.

Last time they went after an upstart who making a splash in the news (SMU), sound familiar?

They might drop the hammer on Ole Miss to try to keep legitimacy, and if they do, I do not trust Sankey to respect the league's founding membership and history enough not to sell Ole Miss out.

Not at all, they won't do shite. We are in a total free market