Started By
Message

Vanderbilt has won 20 National football Titles
Posted on 8/19/25 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 8/19/25 at 7:57 pm
Because I say so. That’s 2 more than Alabama’s 18 and 11 more than Auburn! And we did it in one day.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 7:59 pm to JackTiger99
Cry? Hell no! I am celebrating!
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:01 pm to morriscat2
Vandy was a power in the day when players would literally die to play the game. That was real man football.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:02 pm to Clark14
That real man football was played by 5'7" 140lb players
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:10 pm to jonnyanony
It blows my mind that way back then, Tulane was an SEC powerhouse too.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:13 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
That real man football was played by 5'7" 140lb players
What’s your point? They were smaller back then but the same size as the other teams. No different than today size comparison between teams wise but they were a hell of alot tougher than the product today and played for the love of the game.
And they won 6 national championships between 1906-1922 and they don’t recognize any of them.
Most of the soldiers in wwll were small, were they not real men? Good grief.
Btw, I wasn’t the one who downvoted you.
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:15 pm to morriscat2
Claim it bitch.
Pavia is about to experience pain like he’s never felt this year. 3-9 season incoming.
Pavia is about to experience pain like he’s never felt this year. 3-9 season incoming.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:15 pm to morriscat2
Undefeated in 1921 and 1922.
That’s a natty by Auburn standards.
That’s a natty by Auburn standards.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:16 pm to Clark14
quote:
Most of the soldiers in wwll were small, were they not real men? Good grief.
I didn’t take their comment in a negative way.
I thought the comment was an ode to the 5’7 140lbs men.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:17 pm to Crimson
quote:
Undefeated in 1921 and 1922. That’s a natty by Auburn standards.
Well deserved titles, Commies.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:21 pm to Beachbum87
quote:
I didn’t take their comment in a negative way
Read it again with the post he responded to in context.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:31 pm to Clark14
Umm..please get hit by a 220 pound safety and tell me it is even close to one who is 140...The receiver being bigger still does not make it even. Now no helmet head shots may...but they were classy back then..didn"t go for the head. Think it wasn't til the later in the 80's headshots happened more often. Wasn't reported back then so can't find it...but head shots eithout helmets were rare, mistakes happened, but I do not think it was ever meant to injure someone
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:46 pm to Gatorbait2008
quote:
Umm..please get hit by a 220 pound safety and tell me it is even close to one who is 140...The receiver being bigger still does not make it even. Now no helmet head shots may...but they were classy back then..didn"t go for the hrmead. Think it wasn't til the latr 80's headshots hapoened more often. Wasn't reported back then so can't find it...but head shots eithout helmets were rare, mistakes happened, but I do not think it was ever meant to injure someone
We’re talking about 120+ years ago, hell, kids are bigger now than when I played 50 years ago, no comparison in players but back then the other teams were comparable sizes. Do yo get it? And back in the 1900s there was a season where 19 players died, not injured, but died playing the game. They were going to ban football until teddy roosevelt stepped in and saved it.
You’re talking about apples and oranges here.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 9:06 am to JayAg
quote:
It blows my mind that way back then, Tulane was an SEC powerhouse too.
It was also a time when players went to class (for the most part)
Popular
Back to top
5








